Cited by 265Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSport Psychology and PerformanceNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Anxiety and perceptual-motor performance: toward an integrated model of concepts, mechanisms, and processes

Open access
Nieuwenhuys, Arne, Oudejans, Raôul R. D.·2012·Psychological Research

Abstract

Under anxiety, people sometimes perform poorly. This concerns cognitive performance (e.g., taking an important exam) as well as perceptual-motor performance (e.g., picking up a cup from a table). There is still much debate about how anxiety affects perceptual-motor performance. In the current paper we review the experimental literature on anxiety and perceptual-motor performance, thereby focusing on how anxiety affects the perception, selection, and realization of action possibilities. Based on this review we discuss the merits of two opposing theoretical explanations and build on existing frameworks of anxiety and cognitive performance to develop an integrated model that explains the various ways in which anxiety may specifically affect perceptual-motor performance. This model distinguishes between positive and negative effects of anxiety and, moving beyond previous approaches, recognizes three operational levels (i.e., attentional, interpretational, and behavioral) at which anxiety may affect different aspects of goal-directed action. Finally, predictions are formulated and directions for future research suggested.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00426-011-0384-x

Cites

104 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 106 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nieuwenhuys, A., & Oudejans, R. R. D.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Movement Sciences (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Nieuwenhuys, Arne
Venue
Psychological Research
Published
2011-10-29
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
747-759
ISSN
  • 0033-3026 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-0727
  • 1430-2772
OpenAlex
W2167386533
Cited by
265
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anxiety, perceptual-motor performance, action selection, goal-directed action, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Attention, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychomotor Performance, Performance Anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review