Cited by 112Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Emotion regulation and intimate partner violence in newlyweds.

McNulty, James K., Hellmuth, Julianne C.·2008·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

Is the inability to regulate negative emotions a risk factor for intimate partner violence (IPV)? To address this question, the authors asked 72 newlywed couples to report their levels of negative affect every day for 7 days and examined whether variability in those reports was associated with the IPV self-reported to have been perpetrated over the previous year. Although main effects of variability in both husbands' and wives' negative affect did not reach statistical significance, variability in husbands' negative affect significantly interacted with wives' reports of IPV to account for husbands' IPV, even after overall levels of husbands' negative affect, marital satisfaction, and chronic stress were controlled. Specifically, whereas variability in negative affect was unrelated to IPV among husbands with wives who reported no IPV, such variability was positively associated with the IPV perpetrated by husbands with wives who also reported having perpetrated IPV during the previous year. Although preliminary, these results support theories suggesting that the ability to regulate negative emotions may help intimates avoid perpetrating IPV, particularly when faced with a partner's IPV perpetration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013516

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings regarding the potential inhibiting role of adaptive emotion regulation strategy use are mixed.

    “However, while maladaptive emotion regulation is a well-established impelling factor of IPV perpetration, findings regarding the potential inhibiting role of adaptive emotion regulation strategy use are mixed, calling for further research (Gallagher et al., 2010; Maldonado et al., 2015; Maloney, Echkhardt, & Oesterle, 2023; McNulty & Hellmuth, 2008; Neilson et al., 2023; Puente-Martínez et al., 2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNulty, J. K., & Hellmuth, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2008-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
794-797
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2019731813
Cited by
112
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotion regulation, intimate partner violence, newlyweds, negative affect, affective variability, IPV perpetration, marital satisfaction, chronic stress, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Aggression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Spouse Abuse, Stress, Psychological, Family Conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review