Cited by 36Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The dynamics of integration and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects.

Huber, David E., Tian, Xing, Curran, Tim, O'Reilly, Randall C., Woroch, Brion·2008·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

This article presents data and theory concerning the fundamental question of how the brain achieves a balance between integrating and separating perceptual information over time. This theory was tested in the domain of word reading by examining brain responses to briefly presented words that were either new or immediate repetitions. Critically, the prime that immediately preceded the target was presented either for 150 ms or 2,000 ms, thus examining a situation of perceptual integration versus one of perceptual separation. Electrophysiological responses during the first 200 ms following presentation of the target word were assessed using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings. As predicted by a dynamic neural network model with habituation, repeated words produced less of a perceptual response, and this effect diminished with increased prime duration. Using dynamics that best accounted for the behavioral transition from positive to negative priming with increasing prime duration, the model correctly predicted the time course of the event-related potential (ERP) repetition effects under the assumption that letter processing is the source of observed P100 repetition effects and word processing is the source of observed N170 repetition effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013625

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The angle test of response similarity allows spatial similarity to be evaluated in electrophysiological work.

    “This technique permits the assessment of spatial similarity in electrophysiological experiments (Huber et al., 2008; Tian and Huber, 2008; Davelaar et al., submitted)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huber, D. E., Tian, X., Curran, T., O'Reilly, R. C., & Woroch, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2008
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1389-1416
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2109962023
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH063993-04; MH63993-01; MH061316-01; MH64446; MH64812)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-00-1-0246; N00014-03-1-0428)
  • National Science Foundation (SBE-0542013)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
perceptual integration, word reading, priming, habituation, dynamic neural networks, P100, N170, event-related potentials, magnetoencephalography, prime duration, letter processing, word processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Reading, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reflex, Startle, Magnetoencephalography, Neural Networks, Computer, Feedback, Psychological, Attentional Blink, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review