Cited by 727Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus

Dehaene, Stanislas, Le Clec’H, Gurvan, Poline, Jean-Baptiste, Le Bihan, Denis, Cohen, Laurent·2002·Neuroreport

Abstract

Event-related fMRI was used to test the hypothesis that the visual word form area in the left fusiform gyrus holds a modality-specific and prelexical representation of visual words. Subjects were engaged in a repetition-detection task on pairs of words or pronounceable pseudo-words that could be written or spoken. The visual word form area responded only to written stimuli, not to spoken stimuli, independently of their semantic content. We propose that the occasional activation of the fusiform gyrus when listening to spoken words is due to the topdown recruitment of visual orthographic or object representations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain imaging studies reliably localize a region of visual cortex that is especially responsive to visual words.

    “Brain imaging studies reliably localize a region of visual cortex that is especially responsive to visual words.”
  • This finding is robust enough to identify a significant peak of activation in over 90% of individual subject scans, with a standard deviation of <5 mm.

    “This finding is robust enough to identify a significant peak of activation in over 90% of individual subject scans, with a standard deviation of , 5 mm [8-11] (Fig. 1).”
  • Passive presentation of spoken words elicits no response in the VWFA.

    “Passive presentation of spoken words elicits no response in this region [11].”
  • The VWFA is generally insensitive to factors that influence lexical access, such as contrasts between high- and low-frequency words, or between real and pseudowords.

    “TheVWFAisgenerallyinsensitive to factors that influence lexical access, such as contrasts between high- and lowfrequency words [24], or between real and pseudowords, as revealed by event-related fMRI analyses [11,23,25].”
  • A large number of studies, using various methods, have evidenced a reproducible activation of the left fusiform gyrus during reading.

    “A large number of studies, using various methods, have evidenced a reproducible activation of the left fusiform gyrus during reading.”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Dehaene et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dehaene, S., Le Clec’H, G., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Institut de Biologie et de Chimie des Protéines (FR)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
2002-03
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
321-325
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066530833
Cited by
727
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 29
FWCI
59.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual word form area, fusiform gyrus, modality-specific processing, visual word recognition, spoken word processing, repetition detection, orthographic representation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reaction Time, Reading, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review