The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of comprehensive professional development for teachers of at-risk preschoolers.
Abstract
This study compared effectiveness of as usual to that of 4 professional development (PD) programs that targeted teachers of at-risk preschool children. A 2 X 2 design was used to cross mentoring and progress monitoring conditions among the 4 PD programs. Specifically, some teachers received both in-classroom mentoring and detailed, instructionally linked feedback concerning children's progress in language and literacy. Some teachers received no mentoring but did receive the detailed, instructionally linked feedback concerning children's progress. Some teachers received in-classroom mentoring but only limited feedback on children's progress, which was not linked to curricular activities. Finally, some teachers received no mentoring and only limited feedback concerning children's progress. All 4 PD conditions included the same year-long, facilitated online course that emphasized language and literacy instruction, practice of learned material in one's classroom, and participation in online message boards with fellow teachers. Across 4 states, 158 schools (N = 262 classrooms) were randomly assigned to I of the 4 PD conditions or business as usual. The condition that included online coursework combined with mentoring and detailed, instructionally linked feedback yielded the greatest improvements in teaching behavior and children's school readiness
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neville, H. J., Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Rauschecker, J., Karni, A., Lalwani, A., Braun, A., Clark, V., Jezzard, P., & Turner, R. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.3.922 · Cited by 514
Cited by
Effective Teacher Professional Development
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017) · Learning Policy Institute · doi:10.54300/122.311 · Cited by 4,264
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318759268 · Cited by 1,202
Lonigan, C. J., Allan, N. P., & Lerner, M. D. (2011) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20569 · Cited by 96
Rusby, J. C., Jones, L. B., Crowley, R., Smolkowski, K., & Arthun, C. (2013) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-013-9209-y · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Landry, S. H., Anthony, J. L., Swank, P. R., & Monseque-Bailey, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 448-465
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W1974797648
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 90.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of comprehensive professional development for teachers of at-risk preschoolers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0013842
- The paper
- Landry, S. H., Anthony, J. L., Swank, P. R., & Monseque-Bailey, P. (2009). Effectiveness of comprehensive professional development for teachers of at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.