Cited by 514Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHearing Impairment and CommunicationHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: Biological constraints and effects of experience

Open access
Neville, Helen J., Bavelier, Daphne, Corina, David, Rauschecker, Josef, Karni, Avi, Lalwani, Anil, Braun, Allen, Clark, Vince +2 more·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Cerebral organization during sentence processing in English and in American Sign Language (ASL) was characterized by employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 4 T. Effects of deafness, age of language acquisition, and bilingualism were assessed by comparing results from ( i ) normally hearing, monolingual, native speakers of English, ( ii ) congenitally, genetically deaf, native signers of ASL who learned English late and through the visual modality, and ( iii ) normally hearing bilinguals who were native signers of ASL and speakers of English. All groups, hearing and deaf, processing their native language, English or ASL, displayed strong and repeated activation within classical language areas of the left hemisphere. Deaf subjects reading English did not display activation in these regions. These results suggest that the early acquisition of a natural language is important in the expression of the strong bias for these areas to mediate language, independently of the form of the language. In addition, native signers, hearing and deaf, displayed extensive activation of homologous areas within the right hemisphere, indicating that the specific processing requirements of the language also in part determine the organization of the language systems of the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.3.922

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The language localizer was previously shown to robustly and reliably identify each of the key brain regions previously implicated in high-level linguistic processing in at least 80% of subjects individually.

    “This localizer was previously shown (29) to robustly and reliably identify each of the key brain regions previously implicated in high-level linguistic processing (30, 31) (Fig. 2 and Fig. S1) in at least 80% of subjects individually”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neville, H. J., Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Rauschecker, J., Karni, A., Lalwani, A., Braun, A., Clark, V., Jezzard, P., & Turner, R.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227; Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007; University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100 Israel; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N3BG, United Kingdom; and University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-02-03
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
922-929
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2149301988
Cited by
514
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
16.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
language lateralization, American Sign Language, deafness, sentence processing, age of language acquisition, bilingualism
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Sign Language, Speech Perception, Persons With Hearing Impairments, Persons with Hearing Disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review