The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seeing the mean: Ensemble coding for sets of faces.
Open accessAbstract
We frequently encounter groups of similar objects in our visual environment: a bed of flowers, a basket of oranges, a crowd of people. How does the visual system process such redundancy? Research shows that rather than code every element in a texture, the visual system favors a summary statistical representation of all the elements. The authors demonstrate that although it may facilitate texture perception, ensemble coding also occurs for faces-a level of processing well beyond that of textures. Observers viewed sets of faces varying in emotionality (e.g., happy to sad) and assessed the mean emotion of each set. Although observers retained little information about the individual set members, they had a remarkably precise representation of the mean emotion. Observers continued to discriminate the mean emotion accurately even when they viewed sets of 16 faces for 500 ms or less. Modeling revealed that perceiving the average facial expression in groups of faces was not due to noisy representation or noisy discrimination. These findings support the hypothesis that ensemble coding occurs extremely fast at multiple levels of visual analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception
Navon, D. (1977) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3 · Cited by 4,005
Newsome, W., & Pare, E. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-06-02201.1988 · Cited by 1,615
Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03208840 · Cited by 733
Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision
Noe, A., Pessoa, L., & Thompson, E. (2000) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/135062800394702 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition
Alvarez, G. A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003 · Cited by 586
A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/11.5.4 · Cited by 556
Hypothetical Outcome Plots Help Untrained Observers Judge Trends in Ambiguous Data
Kale, A., Nguyen, F., Kay, M., & Hullman, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864909 · Cited by 122
What are the contents of representations in predictive processing?
Wiese, W. (2017) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-016-9472-0 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Haberman, J., & Whitney, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 718-734
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W1969939582
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seeing the mean: Ensemble coding for sets of faces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0013899
- The paper
- Haberman, J., & Whitney, D. (2009). Seeing the mean: Ensemble coding for sets of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.