The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Segmentation in reading and film comprehension.
Open accessAbstract
When reading a story or watching a film, comprehenders construct a series of representations in order to understand the events depicted. Discourse comprehension theories and a recent theory of perceptual event segmentation both suggest that comprehenders monitor situational features such as characters' goals, to update these representations at natural boundaries in activity. However, the converging predictions of these theories had previously not been tested directly. Two studies provided evidence that changes in situational features such as characters, their locations, their interactions with objects, and their goals are related to the segmentation of events in both narrative texts and films. A 3rd study indicated that clauses with event boundaries are read more slowly than are other clauses and that changes in situational features partially mediate this relation. A final study suggested that the predictability of incoming information influences reading rate and possibly event segmentation. Taken together, these results suggest that processing situational changes during comprehension is an important determinant of how one segments ongoing activity into events and that this segmentation is related to the control of processing during reading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination
NAGELKERKE, N. J. D. (1991) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 · Cited by 5,927
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Situation models in language comprehension and memory
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 · Cited by 2,877
Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events.
Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.29 · Cited by 640
Self-citationThe objective basis of behavior units
Newtson, D., Engquist, G. A., & Bois, J. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.12.847 · Cited by 324
Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries
Speer, N. K., Zacks, J. M., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01920.x · Cited by 296
Self-citationA computational model of event segmentation from perceptual prediction
Reynolds, J. R., Zacks, J. M., & Braver, T. S. (2007) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/15326900701399913 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Cited by
What constitutes an episode in episodic memory?
Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610393742 · Cited by 298
Hasson, U., Egidi, G., Marelli, M., & Willems, R. M. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.018 · Cited by 157
Neurons detect cognitive boundaries to structure episodic memories in humans
Zheng, J., Schjetnan, A. G. P., Yebra, M., Gomes, B. A., Mosher, C. P., Kalia, S. K., Valiante, T. A., Mamelak, A. N., Kreiman, G., & Rutishauser, U. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01020-w · Cited by 129
Geerligs, L., Gözükara, D., Oetringer, D., Campbell, K. L., van Gerven, M., & Güçlü, U. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.77430 · Cited by 78
Cohn, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00680 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-327
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2029040273
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 20.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.