Cited by 640Categorization, perception, and languageMemory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events.

Zacks, Jeffrey M., Tversky, Barbara, Iyer, Gowri·2001·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

How do people perceive routine events, such as making a bed, as these events unfold in time? Research on knowledge structures suggests that people conceive of events as goal-directed partonomic hierarchies. Here, participants segmented videos of events into coarse and fine units on separate viewings; some described the activity of each unit as well. Both segmentation and descriptions support the hierarchical bias hypothesis in event perception: Observers spontaneously encoded the events in terms of partonomic hierarchies. Hierarchical organization was strengthened by simultaneous description and, to a weaker extent, by familiarity. Describing from memory rather than perception yielded fewer units but did not alter the qualitative nature of the descriptions. Although the descriptions were telegraphic and without communicative intent, their hierarchical structure was evident to naive readers. The data suggest that cognitive schemata mediate between perceptual and functional information about events and indicate that these knowledge structures may be organized around object/action units.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.29

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavioral studies show that subjects can segment events into a nested hierarchy from coarse to fine timescales.

    “Behavioral studies have shown that subjects can segment events into a nested hierarchy from coarse to fine timescales (Kurby & Zacks, 2008; Zacks, Tversky, & Iyer, 2001)”

    From Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory (2017) · cites this paper as Zacks, Tversky, & Iyer, 2001

  • Behavioral experiments have shown that long-term memory reflects event structure during encoding.

    “Behavioral experiments have shown that long-term memory reflects event structure during encoding (Ezzyat & Davachi, 2011; Sargent et al., 2013; Zacks, Tversky, et al., 2001).”

    From Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory (2017) · cites this paper as Zacks, Tversky, et al., 2001

  • Event Segmentation Theory holds that segmentation is automatic, operates at multiple scales, and is triggered by salient changes in time, space, objects or characters, goals, or causality.

    “Event Segmentation Theory (EST) [52] holds that segmentation is automatic [53], operates at multiple scales [6], and is triggered by salient changes in time, space, objects or characters, goals, or causality [6].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
2001
Volume
130
Issue
1
Pages
29-58
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2011605810
Cited by
640
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 36
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
event perception, hierarchy, video segmentation, familiarity, cognitive schemas, knowledge structure
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, California, Communication, Decision Making, Humans, Leisure Activities, Memory, Models, Psychological, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Perception, Videotape Recording, Cognitive Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review