The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: more is not necessarily better
Abstract
The efficacy of brief treatments for media-recruited pathological gamblers was tested in a randomized clinical trial design (N = 314). Two self-directed motivational interventions were compared with a 6-week waiting list control and a workbook only control. Brief motivational treatment involved a telephone motivational interview and a mailed self-help workbook. Brief motivational booster treatment involved a telephone motivational interview, a workbook, and 6 booster telephone calls over a 9-month period. Primary outcomes were gambling frequency and dollar losses. As hypothesized, brief and brief booster treatment participants reported less gambling at 6 weeks than those assigned to the control groups. Brief and brief booster treatment participants gambled significantly less often over the first 6 months of the follow-up than workbook only participants. However, the workbook only participants were as likely to have significantly reduced their losses over the year and to have not met criteria for pathological gambling. Contrary to the hypothesis, participants in the brief booster treatment group showed no greater improvement than brief treatment participants. These results provide further support for the value of brief motivational treatments for pathological gambling.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These results appear to be coherent with other studies evaluating the efficacy of offline self-help treatments (Hodgins et al., 2009; Giroux et al., 2015).”
From Online and Mobile Interventions for Problem Gambling, Alcohol, and Drugs: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Hodgins et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002) · Cited by 7,002
Fundamentals of Biostatistics.
(1969) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-70-4-873 · Cited by 4,573
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders : SCID-I : clinical version : scoresheet
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997) · American Psychiatric Press eBooks · Cited by 3,101
(1987) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184 · Cited by 2,948
Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd ed.
Miller, W., & Rollnick, S. (2003) · Journal For Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1097/01445442-200305000-00013 · Cited by 2,634
Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes.
Amrhein, P. C., Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Palmer, M., & Fulcher, L. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.5.862 · Cited by 729
Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment.
Petry, N. M. (2005) · doi:10.1037/10894-000 · Cited by 659
Slutske, W. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.297 · Cited by 554
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hodgins, D. C., Stea, J. N., & Grant, J. E. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62185-x · Cited by 457
Self-citationPotenza, M. N., Balodis, I. M., Derevensky, J., Grant, J. E., Petry, N. M., Verdejo-Garcia, A., & Yip, S. W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0099-7 · Cited by 437
Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling
Cowlishaw, S., Merkouris, S., Dowling, N., Anderson, C., Jackson, A., & Thomas, S. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008937.pub2 · Cited by 321
Barriers to Seeking Help for Gambling Problems: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Suurvali, H., Cordingley, J., Hodgins, D. C., & Cunningham, J. (2009) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-009-9129-9 · Cited by 261
Self-citationBehavioral Addictions as Mental Disorders: To Be or Not To Be?
Petry, N. M., Zajac, K., & Ginley, M. K. (2018) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045120 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., Currie, G., & Fick, G. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 950-960
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2156618671
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- gambling addiction, motivational interview, self-help workbook, telephone-delivered intervention, gambling frequency, gambling losses, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Canada, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Gambling, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Manuals as Topic, Middle Aged, Motivation, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Brief, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Retreatment, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
