Cited by 110Pain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMusic Therapy and Health

Mediators of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients: response expectancies and emotional distress

Open access
Montgomery, Guy H., Hallquist, Michael N., Schnur, Julie B., David, Daniel, Silverstein, Jeffrey H., Bovbjerg, Dana H.·2010·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to test the hypotheses that response expectancies and emotional distress mediate the effects of an empirically validated presurgical hypnosis intervention on postsurgical side effects (i.e., pain, nausea, and fatigue). METHOD: Women (n = 200) undergoing breast-conserving surgery (mean age = 48.50 years; 63% White, 15% Hispanic, 13% African American, and 9% other) were randomized to a hypnosis or to an attention control group. Prior to surgery, patients completed assessments of hypothesized mediators (response expectancies and emotional distress), and following surgery, patients completed assessments of outcome variables (pain, nausea, and fatigue). RESULTS: Structural equation modeling revealed the following: (a) Hypnotic effects on postsurgical pain were partially mediated by pain expectancy (p < .0001) but not by distress (p = .12); (b) hypnotic effects on postsurgical nausea were partially mediated by presurgical distress (p = .02) but not by nausea expectancy (p = .10); and (c) hypnotic effects on postsurgical fatigue were partially mediated by both fatigue expectancy (p = .0001) and presurgical distress (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the mediational roles of response expectancies and emotional distress in clinical benefits associated with a hypnotic intervention for breast cancer surgical patients. More broadly, the results improve understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for hypnotic phenomena and suggest that future hypnotic interventions target patient expectancies and distress to improve postsurgical recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017392

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are several shared risk factors between pain and fatigue after surgery, including depression and outcome expectancies.

    “Interestingly, there are several shared risk factors between pain and fatigue after surgery, including depression and outcome expectancies [22], implying that the very same processes might influence both post-surgical pain and fatigue.”

    From Pre- and post-operative psychological interventions to prevent pain and fatigue after breast cancer surgery (PREVENT): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results sections on postsurgical pain and fatigue report that expectancies mediated the hypnosis intervention’s effects on both outcomes; presurgical distress mediated the fatigue effect but not the pain effect. The paper also discusses prior evidence linking distress to postsurgical pain. It does not establish depression specifically as a shared risk factor, so the claim is broader than the evidence on that point. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO and is reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

    “The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018108791) and is reported according to PRISMA guidelines (Supplementary Material, http://links.lww.com/PR9/A243).99”

    From Adjunctive use of hypnosis for clinical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Method sections describe a hypnosis intervention in breast surgery patients, not the registration or reporting of a review protocol. Searches for PROSPERO, CRD42018108791, and PRISMA found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Horvath AO Bedi RP Norcross JC The alliance Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients 2002 New York, NY Oxford University Press, Inc 37 69
  2. Piper BF Stromborg M Olson S Measuring fatigue Instruments for clinical research in health care 1996 2 ed. Philadelphia W.B. Saunders
  3. Shor RE Orne EC The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A 1962 Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologists Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, G. H., Hallquist, M. N., Schnur, J. B., David, D., Silverstein, J. H., & Bovbjerg, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
80-88
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2114089452
Cited by
110
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA129094-01; CA131473)
  • American Cancer Society (CRTG 04-213-01-CPPB)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
breast-conserving surgery, breast cancer surgery, postoperative pain, response expectancy, emotional distress, mediation, hypnotherapy, surgical side effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Breast, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Suggestion, Mastectomy, Segmental, Chi-Square Distribution, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review