Cited by 25Schizophrenia research and treatmentVisual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Visual search performance among persons with schizophrenia as a function of target eccentricity.

Elahipanah, Ava, Christensen, Bruce K., Reingold, Eyal M.·2010·Neuropsychology

Abstract

The current study investigated one possible mechanism of impaired visual attention among patients with schizophrenia: a reduced visual span. Visual span is the region of the visual field from which one can extract information during a single eye fixation. This study hypothesized that schizophrenia-related visual search impairment is mediated, in part, by a smaller visual span. To test this hypothesis, 23 patients with schizophrenia and 22 healthy controls completed a visual search task where the target was pseudorandomly presented at different distances from the center of the display. Response times were analyzed as a function of search condition (feature vs. conjunctive), display size, and target eccentricity. Consistent with previous reports, patient search times were more adversely affected as the number of search items increased in the conjunctive search condition. It was important however, that patients' conjunctive search times were also impacted to a greater degree by target eccentricity. Moreover, a significant impairment in patients' visual search performance was only evident when targets were more eccentric and their performance was more similar to healthy controls when the target was located closer to the center of the search display. These results support the hypothesis that a narrower visual span may underlie impaired visual search performance among patients with schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017523

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elahipanah, A., Christensen, B. K., & Reingold, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2010
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
192-198
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W1989018813
Cited by
25
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
schizophrenia, visual search, target eccentricity, visual span, visual attention, feature search, screen size
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychotic Disorders, Reaction Time, Schizophrenia, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review