Cited by 426Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond good and evil: The time-course of neural activity elicited by specific picture content.

Abstract

The present study examined electrocortical evidence for a negativity bias, focusing on the impact of specific picture content on a range of event-related potentials (ERPs). To this end, ERPs were recorded while 67 participants viewed a variety of pictures from the International Affective Picture System. Examination of broad categories (i.e., pleasant, neutral, unpleasant) found no evidence for a negativity bias in two early components, the N1 and the Early Posterior Negativity (EPN), but revealed that unpleasant images did elicit a larger late positive potential (LPP) than pleasant pictures. However, images of erotica and mutilation elicited comparable LPP responses, as did affiliative and threatening images. Exciting (i.e., sports) images and disgusting images elicited smaller LPPs than other emotional images, similar to neutral images containing people-which were associated with the largest LPPs among neutral pictures. When these three anomalous categories (exciting, disgusting, and scenes with people) were excluded, unpleasant images no longer elicited a larger LPP than pleasant images. Thus, including exciting images in pleasant ERP averages disproportionately reduces the LPP. The present findings are discussed in light of the motivational significance of specific picture subtypes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0020242

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 92 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 426

Metadata

Authors
Weinberg, A., & Hajcak, G.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2010-12
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
767-782
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2103047209
Cited by
425
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
FWCI
13.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
negativity bias, event-related potentials, late positive potential, emotional valence, unpleasantness, erotic images, mutilation, disgust, International Affective Picture System, N1, early posterior negativity
MeSH terms
Brain, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review