The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Master resilience training in the U.S. Army.
Abstract
The U.S. Army Master Resilience Trainer (MRT) course, which provides face-to-face resilience training, is one of the foundational pillars of the Comprehensive Soldier Fitness program. The 10-day MRT course is the foundation for training resilience skills to sergeants and for teaching sergeants how to teach these skills to their soldiers. The curriculum is based on materials developed by the University of Pennsylvania, the Penn Resilience Program (PRP), and other empirically validated work in the field of positive psychology. This "train the trainer model" is the main vehicle for the dissemination of MRT concepts to the entire force.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.87.1.49 · Cited by 7,121
Self-citationPositive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 · Cited by 5,947
Self-citationPositive education: positive psychology and classroom interventions
Seligman, M. E. P., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. (2009) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054980902934563 · Cited by 2,106
Self-citationPerson versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping.
Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835 · Cited by 659 · cited 1×
“This teaching block also incorporates the work of Kamins and Dweck (1999) on effective praise.”
BackgroundA meta-analytic review of the Penn Resiliency Program’s effect on depressive symptoms.
Brunwasser, S. M., Gillham, J. E., & Kim, E. S. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017671 · Cited by 428
Gillham, J. E., Reivich, K. J., Freres, D. R., Chaplin, T. M., Shatté, A. J., Samuels, B., Elkon, A. G. L., Litzinger, S., Lascher, M., Gallop, R., et al. (2007) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.75.1.9 · Cited by 360
Self-citation
Cited by
Psychological Resilience: A Review and Critique of Definitions, Concepts, and Theory
Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000124 · Cited by 2,547
Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework
Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.016 · Cited by 717
Prilleltensky, I. (2012) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-011-9448-8 · Cited by 425
Jayawickreme, E., Forgeard, M. J. C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2012) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027990 · Cited by 341
Self-citationDefining and characterizing team resilience in elite sport
Morgan, P. B. C., Fletcher, D., & Sarkar, M. (2013) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.01.004 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Reivich, K. J., Seligman, M. E. P., & McBride, S.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-34
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2001835618
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 38.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Master resilience training in the U.S. Army. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0021897
- The paper
- Reivich, K. J., Seligman, M. E. P., & McBride, S. (2011). Master resilience training in the U.S. Army. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
