The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-lasting attentional influence of negative and taboo words in an auditory variant of the emotional Stroop task.
Abstract
Using an auditory adaptation of the emotional and taboo Stroop tasks, the authors compared the effects of negative and taboo spoken words in mixed and blocked designs. Both types of words elicited carryover effects with mixed presentations and interference with blocked presentations, suggesting similar long-lasting attentional effects. Both were also relatively resilient to the long-lasting influence of the preceding emotional word. Hence, contrary to what has been assumed (Schmidt & Saari, 2007), negative and taboo words do not seem to differ in terms of the temporal dynamics of the interdimensional shifting, at least in the auditory modality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A similar effect was shown in the auditory domain for voice identification in French by Bertels et al. (2011).”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Bertels et al. (2011)
Citations
Cites
Attentional bias for threat: evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces
Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930143000527 · Cited by 954
Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.001 · Cited by 709
Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting
Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1997) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206843 · Cited by 475
Sander, D., Grandjean, D., Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M. L., Scherer, K. R., & Vuilleumier, P. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.023 · Cited by 392
Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., Millar, N., & White, J. (1995) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.104.3.532 · Cited by 281
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable
Hunt, M., Cotter, C., Pearson, H., & Stockall, L. (2023) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12588 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertels, J., Kolinsky, R., Pietrons, E., & Morais, J.
- Venue
- Emotion
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-37
- ISSN
- 1931-1516
- 1528-3542
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (1.5705.06)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
