The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The prospective course of postconcussion syndrome: The role of mild traumatic brain injury.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether postconcussion syndrome (PCS) represents long-term sequelae associated with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHODS: Prospective consecutive admissions to a Level 1 trauma hospital were assessed a mean 4.9 days and again 106.2 days post-injury. The final sample comprised 62 mTBI and 58 nonbrain injured trauma controls (TC). Change or lack of change in individual PCS-like symptoms and PCS was examined. Multilevel logistic regression was used to analyze whether mTBI predicts 3-month PCS (Time 2; T2); whether predictors of PCS (within 14 days of injury, Time 1; T1) predict 3-month PCS, and how change in these predictors from T1 to T2 were associated with change in PCS status. Variables included demographic, injury-related, financial incentives, neuropsychological, and psychiatric disorder. RESULTS: MTBI did not predict PCS. PCS was comparable (T1: mTBI: 40.3%, TC: 50.0%; T2: mTBI: 46.8%, TC: 48.3%). At T2, 38.6% were new cases of PCS; between 30.8% and 86.2% reported either a new or more frequent symptom. A pre-injury depressive or anxiety disorder (OR = 2.99, 95% CI [1.38, 6.45]), and acute posttraumatic stress (OR = 1.05, 95% CI [1.00, 1.00]) were early markers of PCS, regardless of mTBI. An interaction between time and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) suggested the relationship between the severity of PTSD symptoms and PCS strengthened over time (OR = 2.66, 95% CI [1.08, 6.55]). Pain was related to PCS. Females were more likely than males to have PCS. CONCLUSION: The data suggest the phenomenon of PCS in trauma patients does not show an association with mTBI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq
Hoge, C. W., McGurk, D., Thomas, J. L., Cox, A. L., Engel, C. C., & Castro, C. A. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072972 · Cited by 2,775
Andrews, G., Henderson, S., & Hall, W. (2001) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.178.2.145 · Cited by 933 · cited 2×
“, 2010; O’Donnell, Creamer, Pattison, & Atkin, 2004), there was a high rate of pre-injury and post-injury psychiatric disorder in mTBI and trauma controls in comparison to Australian population controls (Andrews et al., 2001).”
ResultThe Psychiatric Sequelae of Traumatic Injury
Bryant, R. A., O'Donnell, M. L., Creamer, M., McFarlane, A. C., Clark, C. R., & Silove, D. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09050617 · Cited by 843
Self-citationSex differences in posttraumatic stress disorder
Breslau, N. (1997) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230082012 · Cited by 783
Chronic pain and posttraumatic stress disorder: Mutual maintenance?
Sharp, T. J., & Harvey, A. G. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(00)00071-4 · Cited by 779
BELANGER, H. G., CURTISS, G., DEMERY, J. A., LEBOWITZ, B. K., & VANDERPLOEG, R. D. (2005) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617705050277 · Cited by 715
Felmingham, K., Williams, L. M., Kemp, A. H., Liddell, B., Falconer, E., Peduto, A., & Bryant, R. (2010) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017551 · Cited by 179
Self-citation
Cited by
Diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management of mild traumatic brain injury
Levin, H. S., & Diaz-Arrastia, R. R. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00002-2 · Cited by 535
Systematic Review of Multivariable Prognostic Models for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Silverberg, N. D., Gardner, A. J., Brubacher, J. R., Panenka, W. J., Li, J. J., & Iverson, G. L. (2015) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3600 · Cited by 393
Mental Health Consequences of Traumatic Brain Injury
Howlett, J. R., Nelson, L. D., & Stein, M. B. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.09.024 · Cited by 389
A review of post-concussion syndrome and psychological factors associated with concussion
Broshek, D. K., De Marco, A. P., & Freeman, J. R. (2015) · Brain Injury · doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.974674 · Cited by 379
A Multidimensional Approach to Post-concussion Symptoms in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Polinder, S., Cnossen, M. C., Real, R. G. L., Covic, A., Gorbunova, A., Voormolen, D. C., Master, C. L., Haagsma, J. A., Diaz-Arrastia, R., & von Steinbuechel, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01113 · Cited by 376
Metadata
- Authors
- Meares, S., Shores, E. A., Taylor, A. J., Batchelor, J., Bryant, R. A., Baguley, I. J., Chapman, J., Gurka, J., & Marosszeky, J. E.
- Venue
- Neuropsychology
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 454-465
- ISSN
- 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1559
- OpenAlex
- W2046296512
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.