Cited by 342Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychological and Educational Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: Further evidence for a dual systems model.

Harden, K. Paige, Tucker-Drob, Elliot M.·2011·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Consistent with social neuroscience perspectives on adolescent development, previous cross-sectional research has found diverging mean age-related trends for sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence. The present study uses longitudinal data on 7,640 youth from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth Children and Young Adults, a nationally representative sample assessed biennially from 1994 to 2006. Latent growth curve models were used to investigate mean age-related changes in self-reports of impulsivity and sensation seeking from ages 12 to 24 years, as well individual differences in these changes. Three novel findings are reported. First, impulsivity and sensation seeking showed diverging patterns of longitudinal change at the population level. Second, there was substantial person-to-person variation in the magnitudes of developmental change in both impulsivity and sensation seeking, with some teenagers showing rapid changes as they matured and others maintaining relatively constant levels with age. Finally, the correlation between age-related changes in impulsivity and sensation seeking was modest and not significant. Together, these results constitute the first support for the dual systems model of adolescent development to derive from longitudinal behavioral data.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023279

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 340

Metadata

Authors
Harden, K. P., & Tucker-Drob, E. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
739-746
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2120989941
Cited by
342
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
16.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD042849)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
sensation seeking, impulsivity, adolescent development, individual differences, dual systems model, age-related changes, self-report
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Age Factors, Child, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Individuality, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review