Cited by 1,542Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychological and Educational Research StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model.

Steinberg, Laurence, Albert, Dustin, Cauffman, Elizabeth, Banich, Marie, Graham, Sandra, Woolard, Jennifer·2008·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that sensation seeking and impulsivity, which are often conflated, in fact develop along different timetables and have different neural underpinnings, and that the difference in their timetables helps account for heightened risk taking during adolescence. In order to test these propositions, the authors examined age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity in a socioeconomically and ethnically diverse sample of 935 individuals between the ages of 10 and 30, using self-report and behavioral measures of each construct. Consistent with the authors' predictions, age differences in sensation seeking, which are linked to pubertal maturation, follow a curvilinear pattern, with sensation seeking increasing between 10 and 15 and declining or remaining stable thereafter. In contrast, age differences in impulsivity, which are unrelated to puberty, follow a linear pattern, with impulsivity declining steadily from age 10 on. Heightened vulnerability to risk taking in middle adolescence may be due to the combination of relatively higher inclinations to seek excitement and relatively immature capacities for self-control that are typical of this period of development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0012955

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The correlation between self-reported pubertal development and sensation seeking may be stronger for boys than for girls.

    “Newer studies have replicated this result (Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2013, Gunn and Smith, 2010, Quevedo et al., 2009, Urošević et al., 2014) and have found evidence that the correlation between self-reported pubertal development and sensation seeking may be stronger for boys than for girls (Castellanos-Ryan et al., 2013, Steinberg et al., 2008).”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Steinberg et al., 2008

  • By the early-to-mid 20s the frequency of impulsive behavior appears to stabilize at levels much lower than those exhibited by adolescents.

    “Although adults sometimes engage in impulsive acts, by the early-to-mid 20s the frequency of impulsive behavior appears to stabilize at levels much lower than those exhibited by adolescents (Steinberg et al., 2008, Quinn and Harden, 2013).”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Steinberg et al., 2008

  • This maturation is thought to support improvements in executive abilities such as response inhibition, strategic planning, impulse regulation, and flexible rule use.

    “This maturation is thought to support improvements in executive abilities such as response inhibition (Luna et al., 2010), strategic planning (Luciana, Collins, Olson & Schissel, 2009), impulse regulation (Steinberg et al., 2008), and flexible rule use (Crone, Donohue, Honomichl, Wendelken & Bunge, 2006).”
  • Similar results have been reported for impulsivity and sensation-seeking which also followed separable developmental trajectories.

    “Similar results have been reported for impulsivity and sensation-seeking which also followed separable developmental trajectories (Steinberg et al., 2008).”
  • This pattern resembles observations from two earlier studies examining risk-taking in the laboratory, self-reported sensation-seeking, and real-life risk-taking behavior.

    “This pattern resembles observations from two earlier studies examining risk-taking in the laboratory (Figner et al., 2009;Burnett et al., 2010), but also with trajectories of selfreported sensation-seeking (Steinberg et al., 2008;Shulman et al., 2015) and reallife risk-taking behavior (Eaton et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2008
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1764-1778
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2131065756
Cited by
1,542
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 118 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 96 · 2012: 62
FWCI
21.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
sensation seeking, impulsivity, age differences, dual systems model, pubertal development, risk-taking, adolescence, self-control, self-report measures, behavioral measures
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Decision Making, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Individuality, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Personality Development, Puberty, Reaction Time, Risk-Taking, Self Disclosure, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review