Cited by 120Policing Practices and PerceptionsPublic Policy and Administration ResearchCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why does the public cooperate with law enforcement? The influence of the purposes and targets of policing.

Huq, Aziz Z., Tyler, Tom R., Schulhofer, Stephen J.·2011·Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Abstract

All in-text\treferences\tunderlined\tin\tblue\tare\tlinked\tto\tpublications\ton\tResearchGate, letting you\taccess\tand\tread\tthem\timmediately.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023367

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A related survey of non-Muslim New Yorkers had similar findings, showing spillover effects from the post-9/11 counterterrorism policing of Muslims.

    “A related survey of non-Muslim New Yorkers (Huq et al., 2011) had similar findings, showing spillover effects from the post-9/11 counterterrorism policing of Muslims.”
  • These non-Muslim respondents indicated they were less likely to cooperate with police investigations or provide tips about crimes including terrorism when they saw police targeting Muslims and treating them disrespectfully.

    “These non-Muslim respondents also indicated they were less likely to cooperate with police investigations or provide tips about crimes including terrorism when they saw police targeting Muslims and treating them disrespectfully.”
  • Quantitative data illustrated the damage to NYPD relations with Muslim and non-Muslim New Yorkers alike stemming from the application of its adversarial habitus to post-9/11 counterterrorism.

    “Quantitative data further illustrated the damage to NYPD relations with Muslim and nonMuslim New Yorkers alike stemming from the application of its adversarial habitus to post9/11 counterterrorism (Tyler et al., 2010; Huq et al., 2011).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Huq, A. Z., Tyler, T. R., & Schulhofer, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
Published
2011-08
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
419-450
ISSN
  • 1076-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1528
OpenAlex
W2019624095
Cited by
120
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
FWCI
79.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law (publishedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Justice
  • Open Society Institute
  • New York University
  • University of Chicago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
police-community relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review