Cited by 140Forgiveness and Related BehaviorsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Forgiveness and relationship satisfaction: Mediating mechanisms.

Open access
Braithwaite, Scott R., Selby, Edward A., Fincham, Frank D.·2011·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

Although the ability to forgive transgressions has been linked to overall relationship satisfaction, the mechanisms that mediate this association have not been established. We propose that the tendency to forgive a romantic partner increases relationship satisfaction via increased relational effort and decreased negative conflict. In two studies, we used structural equations modeling to examine these variables as potential mechanisms that drive this association. In Study 1 (N = 523) and Study 2 (N = 446) we found that these variables significantly mediated the association between forgiveness and relationship satisfaction. The findings were robust when examined concurrently and longitudinally, across multiple measures of forgiveness, and when accounting for baseline relationship satisfaction and interpersonal commitment. These two mechanisms parallel theorized positive and negative dimensions of forgiveness and the motivational transformation that is said to underlie forgiveness. Theoretical implications and implications for intervention are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0024526

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Worthington EL 1994 Marriage counseling: A Christian approach Journal of Psychology and Christianity 13 166 173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Fincham, F. D.
Affiliations
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
551-559
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2141161143
Cited by
140
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH081396)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
forgiveness, relationship satisfaction, romantic relationships, mediation, relationship commitment, transgression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, Forgiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review