Cited by 64Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaChild Therapy and Development

Trauma systems therapy: 15-month outcomes and the importance of effecting environmental change.

Ellis, B. Heidi, Fogler, Jason, Hansen, Susan, Forbes, Peter, Navalta, Carryl P., Saxe, Glenn·2012·Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Abstract

This study tracked the clinical course of 124 children receiving trauma systems therapy (TST). In addition, exploratory analyses compared hospitalization rates before and after implementation of the model and comparative cost savings were estimated. Children ages 3–20 who experienced potentially traumatic events received TST intervention. Measures of clinical course, children’s psychiatric and psychosocial functioning, and social-environmental stability were taken at intake, 4–6 months, and 12–15 months. Exploratory analyses of cost savings were evaluated by comparing pre- and postimplementation hospitalization rates and lengths of stay for children under the care of the county mental health department. Emotion regulation, social-environmental stability, and child functioning/strengths improved significantly with treatment. Improvement in child functioning/strengths and in socialenvironmental stability significantly contributed to overall improvement in emotion regulation. Children who became stable enough to transition to office-based services during early treatment tended to stay in treatment and continued to improve. The number of children needing crisis-stabilization services at 15 months was reduced more than half for those who completed treatment. Poorer baseline emotion regulation was associated with hospitalization, and poorer social-environmental stability predicted fewer days-to-hospitalization. Exploratory analyses show that post-implementation hospitalization rates dropped 36% and average length of stay decreased by 23%, suggesting that further exploration of potential cost savings is warranted. These findings underscore the clinical importance of intervention and long-term treatment to stabilize the social environment of children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress, and emphasize the potential cost effectiveness of an intensive, community-based treatment approach at the county level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025192

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, B. H., Fogler, J., Hansen, S., Forbes, P., Navalta, C. P., & Saxe, G.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
Published
2012-11
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
624-630
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2167719138
Cited by
64
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
child and adolescent trauma, post-traumatic stress, emotion regulation, hospitalization rates, length of hospital stay, cost reduction, community-based treatment, crisis stabilization, treatment retention, county mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review