The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority.
Open accessAbstract
Research on shame about in-group moral failure has yielded paradoxical results. In some studies, shame predicts self-defensive motivations to withdraw. In other studies, shame predicts pro-social motivations, such as restitution. We think that this paradox can be explained by disentangling the numerous appraisals and feelings subsumed under the label "shame." In 2 studies, we asked community samples of Norwegians about their in-group's discrimination against the Tater minority. Confirmatory factor analysis validated the measures of the appraisals and feelings used in Study 1 (N = 206) and Study 2 (N = 173). In both studies, an appraisal of the in-group as suffering a moral defect best predicted felt shame, whereas an appraisal of concern for condemnation of the in-group best predicted felt rejection. In both studies, felt rejection best predicted self-defensive motivation, whereas felt shame best predicted pro-social motivation. Implications for conceptualizing and studying shame are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212 · Cited by 2,379
Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Spears, R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 · Cited by 1,826
Self-citationAre shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1256 · Cited by 1,556
On Being Rejected: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research on Rejection
Gerber, J., & Wheeler, L. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01158.x · Cited by 498
Interpersonal Guilt, Shame, and Psychological Problems
O'Connor, L. E., Berry, J. W., & Weiss, J. (1999) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.1999.18.2.181 · Cited by 159
Cited by
Collective Trauma and the Social Construction of Meaning
Hirschberger, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01441 · Cited by 581
“The literature on in-group responsibility for historical crimes reveals a complex picture with motivations to both defend the in-group and repair relationships with the out-group (Gausel et al., 2012).”
BackgroundOn the Importance of Being Moral: The Distinctive Role of Morality in Social Judgment
Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397 · Cited by 373
Self-citationUnanue, W., Dittmar, H., Vignoles, V. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2014) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1954 · Cited by 124
Self-citationLeach, C. W., Bilali, R., & Pagliaro, S. (2015) · APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 2: Group processes. · doi:10.1037/14342-005 · Cited by 120
Self-citationManaging shame and guilt in addiction: A pathway to recovery
Snoek, A., McGeer, V., Brandenburg, D., & Kennett, J. (2021) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106954 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Gausel, N., Leach, C. W., Vignoles, V. L., & Brown, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 941-960
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2035834437
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 20.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0027233
- The paper
- Gausel, N., Leach, C. W., Vignoles, V. L., & Brown, R. (2012). Defend or repair? Explaining responses to in-group moral failure by disentangling feelings of shame, rejection, and inferiority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
