Cited by 1,556Emotions and Moral BehaviorForgiveness and Related BehaviorsPersonality Traits and Psychology

Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?

Tangney, June Price, Miller, Rowland S., Flicker, Laura, Barlow, Deborah Hill·1996·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

182 undergraduates described personal embarrassment, shame, and guilt experiences and rated these experiences on structural and phenomenological dimensions. Contrary to popular belief, shame was no more likely than guilt to be experienced in "public" situations; all 3 emotions typically occurred in social contexts, but a significant proportion of shame and guilt events occurred when respondents were alone. Analyses of participants' phenomenological ratings clearly demonstrated that shame, guilt, and embarrassment are not merely different terms for the same affective experience. In particular, embarrassment was a relatively distant neighbor of shame and guilt, and the differences among the 3 could not be explained simply by intensity of affect or by degree of moral transgression. Finally, participants generally were their own harshest critics in each type of event, evaluating themselves more negatively than they believed others did.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1256

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shame is closely related to guilt but can be differentiated from it: guilt focuses on the person transgressed or the relationship affected and pushes us to repair damage, whereas shame encourages withdrawal and retreat.

    “Shame is closely related to guilt, but can be differentiated from it. In guilt, focus is typically on the person who was transgressed or the relationship that was affected, rather than the self (Tangney et al., 1996). Guilt pushes us out into the world, in an attempt to activate efforts to repair the damage by either reparative action or punishment (Tangney et al., 1996). In contrast, shame”

    From Is Shame Hallucinogenic? (2017) · cites this paper as Tangney et al., 1996

  • Shame is associated with a desire to hide.

    “It is therefore unsurprising that shame is associated with a desire to hide (Tangney et al., 1996).”

    From Is Shame Hallucinogenic? (2017) · cites this paper as Tangney et al., 1996

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1996
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
1256-1269
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4241650702
Cited by
1,556
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 59
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
shame, guilt, embarrassment, emotion taxonomy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Emotions, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Shame, Social Behavior, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review