CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of the Coping Flexibility Scale: Evidence for the coping flexibility hypothesis.

Kato, Tsukasa·2012·Journal of Counseling Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0027770
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Coping flexibility was defined as the ability to discontinue an ineffective coping strategy (i.e., evaluation coping) and produce and implement an alternative coping strategy (i.e., adaptive coping). The Coping Flexibility Scale (CFS) was developed on the basis of this definition. Five studies involving approximately 4,400 Japanese college students and employees were conducted to test the hypothesis that flexible coping produces more adaptive outcomes. Studies 1, 2, and 3 provided evidence of the reliability of the CFS scores as well as of its convergent and discriminant validity for Japanese samples. Study 4 further demonstrated that flexible coping was positively associated with improved psychological health, including reduced depression, anxiety, and distress. In Study 5, coping flexibility as measured by the CFS was associated with reduced future depression, even after controlling for the effects of other coping flexibility measures and popular coping strategies. Overall, these results suggest that a valid approach for assessing coping flexibility has been developed and that flexible coping can contribute to psychological health. The implications of these findings for clinical practice are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0027770

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Kato, T.
ORCID
Kato, Tsukasa
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2012-04
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
262-273
ISSN
  • 1939-2168
  • 0022-0167
DOI
10.1037/a0027770
Cited by
275
References
13
Language
en
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientist 20730407)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant-in-Aid Fellows 00077)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review