The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement.
Abstract
Although studies on employee recovery accumulate at a stunning pace, the commonly used theory (Effort-Recovery model) that explains how recovery occurs has not been explicitly tested. We aimed to unravel the recovery process by examining whether off-job activities enhance next morning vigor to the extent that they enable employees to relax and detach from work. In addition, we investigated whether adequate recovery also helps employees to work with more enthusiasm and vigor on the next workday. On five consecutive days, a total of 74 employees (356 data points) reported the hours they spent on various off-job activities, their feelings of psychological detachment, and feelings of relaxation before going to sleep. Feelings of vigor were reported on the next morning, and day-levels of work engagement were reported after work. As predicted, leisure activities (social, low-effort, and physical activities) increased next morning vigor through enhanced psychological detachment and relaxation. High-duty off-job activities (work and household tasks) reduced vigor because these activities diminished psychological detachment and relaxation. Moreover, off-job activities significantly affected next day work engagement. Our results support the assumption that recovery occurs when employees engage in off-job activities that allow for relaxation and psychological detachment. The findings also underscore the significance of recovery after work: Adequate recovery not only enhances vigor in the morning, but also helps employees to stay engaged during the next workday.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513 · Cited by 18,187
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 · Cited by 18,025
The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework
Kaplan, S. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · Cited by 6,923
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
Russell, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145 · Cited by 6,113
Social and Psychological Resources and Adaptation
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307 · Cited by 4,594 · cited 13×
“The novel idea was that resources appear to come in resource caravans: once obtained, resources can generate new resources (Hobfoll, 2002).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1512 · Cited by 4,214
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317904322915892 · Cited by 3,483
Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20004 · Cited by 2,565
Self-citationSalanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217 · Cited by 2,276
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204 · Cited by 2,133
Cited by
Burnout and work engagement: the JD–R approach.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235 · Cited by 2,486
Self-citationRecovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1924 · Cited by 1,307
Job Demands—Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout
Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021) · Anxiety, Stress, & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695 · Cited by 1,131
“Ten Brummelhuis et al. (2011) found in their two-year followup study that employees who scored higher on burnout reported a stronger decrease in social support, a stronger reduction in job autonomy and information, and less opportunities to participate in decision-making (see also, De Beer et al., 2013).”
BackgroundAdvances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next?
Sonnentag, S., Venz, L., & Casper, A. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000079 · Cited by 587
Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: A theoretical analysis
Bakker, A. B., & Costa, P. L. (2014) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.003 · Cited by 468
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 445-455
- ISSN
- 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2105811463
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0029213
- The paper
- ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.