The DOI matches its Crossref record; 663 of the 667 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 4 are not checked yet.
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards
Open accessAbstract
This article systematically reviews the research design and methodological characteristics of single-case experimental design (SCED) research published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2010. SCEDs provide researchers with a flexible and viable alternative to group designs with large sample sizes. However, methodological challenges have precluded widespread implementation and acceptance of the SCED as a viable complementary methodology to the predominant group design. This article includes a description of the research design, measurement, and analysis domains distinctive to the SCED; a discussion of the results within the framework of contemporary standards and guidelines in the field; and a presentation of updated benchmarks for key characteristics (e.g., baseline sampling, method of analysis), and overall, it provides researchers and reviewers with a resource for conducting and evaluating SCED research. The results of the systematic review of 409 studies suggest that recently published SCED research is largely in accordance with contemporary criteria for experimental quality. Analytic method emerged as an area of discord. Comparison of the findings of this review with historical estimates of the use of statistical analysis indicates an upward trend, but visual analysis remains the most common analytic method and also garners the most support among those entities providing SCED standards. Although consensus exists along key dimensions of single-case research design, and researchers appear to be practicing within these parameters, there remains a need for further evaluation of assessment and sampling techniques and data analytic methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A minimum of 5 points per phase is considered the standard in multiple baseline design (Smith 2012).”
From Towards a Treatment for Intolerance of Uncertainty for Autistic Adults: A Single Case Experimental Design Study. (2018) · cites this paper as Smith 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The increasing baseline rates for some incident types may have contributed to the significant declines observed during implementation. However, program effects persisted after excluding agencies with significant baseline trends, making regression to the mean a less plausible explanation for our findings (Smith 2012).”
From Intervening at the Setting Level to Prevent Behavioral Incidents in Residential Child Care: Efficacy of the CARE Program Model (2016) · cites this paper as Smith 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Single case experimental designs (SCED) provide a pragmatic alternative that, when well-designed and executed, rival the scientific rigor of randomized controlled trials while requiring far fewer participants (Barlow, Nock, & Hersen, 2008; Smith, 2012; Vilardaga, 2014).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy modules: Differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes (2016) · cites this paper as Smith, 2012
In the citing paper
“We followed guidelines in the design, analysis and reporting of case series to ensure the method was applied optimally”
From Bringing light into darkness: A multiple baseline mixed methods case series evaluation of Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) (2019) · cites this paper as Smith, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Notice of Redundant Publication
(2011) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.221 · Cited by 26
RetractedDevlin, P. (2008) · Education and training in developmental disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416470804300409 · Cited by 16
RetractedMaximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Book Review: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
Geurts, M. D., Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150485 · Cited by 19,410
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Breitung, J., & Hamilton, J. D. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076916 · Cited by 11,114
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter
Fildes, R. A., Harvey, A. C., West, M., & Harrison, J. (1991) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2583225 · Cited by 4,683
The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis
Jones, F. N., & Skinner, B. F. (1939) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416495 · Cited by 4,388
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Diggle P Liang KY 2001 Analyses of longitudinal data New York Oxford University Press
- Kratochwill TR Chair Members of the Task Force on Evidence-Based Interventions in School Psychology 2003 Procedural and coding manual for review of evidence-based interventions Retrieved July 18, 2011 from http://www.sp-ebi.org/documents/_workingfiles/EBImanual1.pdf
- Andrews-Salvia M Roy N Cameron RM 2003 Evaluating the effects of memory books for individuals with severe dementia Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 11 1 51 59
- Ardoin SP McCall M Klubnik C 2007 Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Providing drill versus practice opportunities Journal of Behavioral Education 16 1 55 70
- Bermúdez-Ornelas G Hernández-Guzmán L 2008 Tratamiento de una sesión de la fobia específica a las arañas en niños [Treatment of a session of phobia to spiders in children] International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 8 3 779 791
- Bliss SL Skinner CH Adams R 2006 Enhancing an English language learning fifth-grade student’s sight-word reading with a time-delay taped-words intervention School Psychology Review 35 4 663 670
- Cho H Wilke DJ 2005 How has the Violence Against Women Act affected the response of the criminal justice system to domestic violence? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 32 4 125 139
- Clarfield J Stoner G 2005 Research brief: The effects of computerized reading instruction on the academic performance of students identified with ADHD School Psychology Review 34 2 246 254
- Dojo Y Tanaka-Matsumi J Inoue N 2004 Effect of goal setting with a target behavior card on class preparation behavior of children in a regular classroom The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 19 2 148 160
- Endo Y Ohkubo K Gomi Y Noguchi M Takahashi N Takei S Noro F 2007 Application of interdependent group-oriented contingencies to cleaning behaviors of students in an elementary school: Effects of class-wide intervention and social validity The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 22 1 17 30
- Feather JS Ronan KR 2006 Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy for abused children with posttraumatic stress disorder: A pilot study New Zealand Journal of Psychology 35 3 132 145
- Fujita Y Hasegawa Y 2003 Weight control: Selection of low-calorie food The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 1 3 9
- Gyovai LK Cartledge G Kourea L Yurick A Gibson L 2009 Early reading intervention: Responding to the learning needs of young at-risk English language learners Learning Disability Quarterly 32 3 143 162
- Hastie PA Sharpe T 2006 Implementation guidelines: Introducing a changing-criterion design to hold students accountable in structured physical activity settings Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 7 1 89 91
- Hirasawa N Fujiwara Y Yamane M 2009 Physical arrangements and staff implementation of function-based interventions in school and community settings Japanese Journal of Special Education 46 6 435 446
- Hirayoshi S Nakajima S 2003 Do rats press the lever for longer than the required duration?: Differential reinforcement of response duration and response topography The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 2 99 107
- Killu K Weber KP McLaughlin TF 2001 An evaluation of repeated readings across various counting periods of see to think, think to say, and think to write channels with a university student with learning disabilities Journal of Precision Teaching & Celeration 17 2 39 57
- Li Q Wang X-C Cheng L-G 2008 Multiple-baseline design on pretend game for the rectification of children’s aggressive behavior Chinese Mental Health Journal 22 3 175 178
- Matchett DL Burns MK 2009 Increasing word recognition fluency with an English-language learner Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 10 2 194 206
- Okuda K 2005 Behavioral consultation services for school-refusal students with high-functioning pervasive developmental disorders: Token economy and changing reinforcement criteria The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 20 1 2 12
- Okuyama T Isawa S 2010 Right-left discrimination from one’s own and another person’s viewpoint in children with autism: Higher-order conditional discrimination and generalization of viewpoint Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 24 2 2 16
- Ota K 2010 Self-recording and accuracy of writing responses by students with developmental disabilities Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 24 2 17 29
- Saecker LB Skinner CH Sager-Brown K Roberts AS 2009 Using responsiveness data and learning theories to modify interventions: Cover, copy, and compare to enhance number-writing accuracy Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools 10 2 171 187
- Sakamoto M Muto T Mochizuki A 2003 Enhancing the self-determination of students with autism: Evaluation of a training package for teachers The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 18 1 25 37
- Salem S Fazzio D Arnal L Fregeau P Thomson K Martin GL Yu CT 2009 A self-instructional package for teaching university students to conduct discrete-trials teaching with children with autism Journal on Developmental Disabilities 15 1 21 29
- Schneider N Goldstein H 2009 Social Stories™ improve the on-task behavior for children with language impairment Journal of Early Intervention 31 3 250 264
- Smith JD Handler L Nash MR 2010 Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: A replicated single-case time-series design Psychological Assessment 22 3 593 602 10.1037/a0019697 20822271 · DOI
- Watanabe T Kanayama Y Muto T 2007 Improving communication between regular class teachers and teaching assistants: Increasing teachers’ comments by modifying communication cards The Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis 22 1 39 48
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000191 · Cited by 1,449
Brysbaert, M. (2019) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.72 · Cited by 996
Evaluating Intervention Effects in Single‐Case Research Designs
Vannest, K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/jcad.12038 · Cited by 665
Francis, A. W., Dawson, D. L., & Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2016) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.05.003 · Cited by 496
Graham, C. D., Gouick, J., Krahé, C., & Gillanders, D. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.009 · Cited by 476
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Justin D.
- ORCID
- Smith, Justin D.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-550
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- PMC
- PMC3652808
- OpenAlex
- W1978096047
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 648
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH20012)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- single-case experimental design, study design quality, methodological standards, visual analysis, statistical analysis methods, methodological quality
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research Design, Benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
