The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating inter-individual differences in short-term intra-individual variability.
Open accessAbstract
Intra-individual variability over a short period of time may contain important information about how individuals differ from each other. In this article we begin by discussing diverse indicators for quantifying intra-individual variability and indicate their advantages and disadvantages. Then we propose an alternative method that models inter-individual differences in intra-individual variability by separately considering both the amplitude of fluctuations and temporal dependency in the data. In the proposed model, temporal dependency and amplitude of fluctuations are both included as random effects. Parameter estimation is done with a multiple-step approach using maximum likelihood, or with a recommended 1-step approach using a Bayesian method. The similarities and differences between the proposed method and some existing methods are discussed and investigated using diary study data from older adults. The results from empirical data analysis revealed that temporal dependency and amplitude of fluctuations have different predictability of health outcomes and thus should be modeled and considered separately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 · Cited by 35,234
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119513469 · Cited by 4,639
Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates.
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.662 · Cited by 571
Sliwinski, M. J., Almeida, D. M., Smyth, J., & Stawski, R. S. (2009) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017925 · Cited by 241
Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3701_06 · Cited by 205
Cited by
Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology
Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608 · Cited by 4,359
Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Muthén, B. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1446819 · Cited by 549
Self-citationAffect dynamics in relation to depressive symptoms: Variable, unstable or inert?
Koval, P., Pe, M. L., Meers, K., & Kuppens, P. (2013) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0033579 · Cited by 288
Affective dynamics in psychopathology
Trull, T. J., Lane, S. P., Koval, P., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2015) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073915590617 · Cited by 274
Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.003 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L. (., Hamaker, E., & Bergeman, C. S.
- Venue
- Psychological Methods
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 567-581
- ISSN
- 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2104306066
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating inter-individual differences in short-term intra-individual variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0029317
- The paper
- Wang, L. (., Hamaker, E., & Bergeman, C. S. (2012). Investigating inter-individual differences in short-term intra-individual variability. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.