Cited by 241Aging and Gerontology ResearchMental Health Research TopicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Intraindividual change and variability in daily stress processes: findings from two measurement-burst diary studies

Open access
Sliwinski, Martin J., Almeida, David M., Smyth, Joshua, Stawski, Robert S.·2009·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

There is little longitudinal information on aging-related changes in emotional responses to negative events. In the present article, we examined intraindividual change and variability in the within-person coupling of daily stress and negative affect using data from 2 measurement-burst daily diary studies. Three main findings emerged. First, average reactivity to daily stress increased longitudinally, and this increase was evident across most of the adult lifespan. Second, individual differences in emotional reactivity to daily stress exhibited long-term temporal stability, but this stability was greatest in midlife and decreased in old age. Third, reactivity to daily stress varied reliably within-persons (across-time), with individuals exhibiting higher levels of reactivity during times when reporting high levels of global subject stress in the previous month. Taken together, the present results emphasize the importance of modeling dynamic psychosocial and aging processes that operate across different time scales for understanding age-related changes in daily stress processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0017925

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies of intra-individual emotion variability fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically control for it.

    “most studies of intra-individual emotion variability simply fail to consider gender or attempt to statistically “control” for it20–28.”

    From Little evidence for sex or ovarian hormone influences on affective variability (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The section “Modeling intraindividual variability in the stress-affect relationship” (page unavailable) says researchers often examine gender as a predictor of between-person differences in emotional reactivity. That runs contrary to the claim that most such studies either ignore gender or merely control for it. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is some stability in daily emotional stress responses, at least in midlife, and these may weaken with age.

    “There is some stability in daily emotional stress responses, at least in midlife, and these may weaken with age (Sliwinski et al., 2009).”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Sliwinski et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sliwinski, M. J., Almeida, D. M., Smyth, J., & Stawski, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2009
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
828-840
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2166437214
Cited by
241
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 AG12448; AG026728, P01 AG0210166-02; R01 AG19239; T32 MH018904, R01 AG026453)
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
daily stress, negative affect, emotional reactivity, within-person variability, aging, longitudinal change, temporal stability, midlife, old age
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Humans, Individuality, Life Change Events, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review