Cited by 276Mental Health Research TopicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Affective dynamics in psychopathology

Open access
Trull, Timothy J., Lane, Sean P., Koval, Peter, Ebner-Priemer, Ulrich W.·2015·Emotion Review

Abstract

We discuss three varieties of affective dynamics ( affective instability, emotional inertia, and emotional differentiation). In each case, we suggest how these affective dynamics should be operationalized and measured in daily life using time-intensive methods, like ecological momentary assessment or ambulatory assessment, and recommend time-sensitive analyses that take into account not only the variability but also the temporal dependency of reports. Studies that explore how these affective dynamics are associated with psychological disorders and symptoms are reviewed, and we emphasize that these affective processes are within a nexus of other components of emotion regulation.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that affective instability, emotional inertia, and emotional differentiation are dynamic processes best captured with time-intensive assessment (e.g., EMA/ambulatory assessment) and time-sensitive analyses rather than retrospective or variance-only indices. It links these dynamics to psychopathology, especially borderline personality disorder and depression, and recommends decomposing variability from temporal dependency.

Key findings

  • Affective instability should combine variability and temporal dependency; a standard deviation alone is not time-sensitive. BPD consistently shows heightened instability, and Santangelo et al. (2014) found PTSD and bulimia nervosa patients showed similarly heightened instability of emotional valence and distress as BPD patients; instability is more extreme in BPD than MDD, with BPD showing higher variability and MDD showing higher temporal dependency.
  • Emotional inertia, estimated as within-person autocorrelation of affect, is linked to depression vulnerability markers including neuroticism, low self-esteem, trait rumination, subclinical depressive symptoms, and the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism. Kuppens et al. (2012) found heightened inertia prospectively predicted MDD onset among adolescents even after adjusting for mean negative affect and gender, suggesting inertia may be an “early warning signal.”
  • Emotional differentiation findings are mixed by disorder and valence: MDD showed lower negative emotion differentiation than controls but no positive differentiation difference; schizophrenia showed lower overall emotion differentiation but not for negative emotion; BPD showed less negative emotional differentiation than controls. Tomko et al. (in press) found greater momentary and average daily differentiation predicted lower momentary impulsivity, whereas a global 28-day measure of negative differentiation did not.
  • The review concludes that affective dynamics are intraindividual and time-sensitive, should be assessed at momentary, daily, or weekly levels, and should not extend beyond daily levels unless testing periodicity hypotheses; it also notes that RDoC-style classifications often ignore dynamic emotional processes.

Methods

  • Narrative review of three affective dynamics: affective instability, emotional inertia, and emotional differentiation. No primary sample or original data are reported.
  • Synthesizes prior studies using ecological momentary assessment, ambulatory assessment, daily diaries, and laboratory methods, with emphasis on repeated momentary affect assessments.
  • Main analysis is conceptual and methodological synthesis, recommending time-sensitive indices such as multilevel models of squared successive differences, probability of acute changes, multilevel autoregressive models, and intraclass correlations for differentiation; no systematic search or meta-analysis is described.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: retrospective questionnaires and classical statistical indices are not well suited to within-person processes and introduce bias; standard deviation/variance is not time-sensitive; sampling frequency and timescale must match the process; average interitem correlations are less desirable than between-person ICCs; differentiation estimates confound systematic variability from time of day, day of week, and emotion-evoking events and ignore temporal dependencies; whether emotional inertia remains elevated during a current MDD episode remains unclear.
  • Stated in the paper: Santangelo et al. (2014) argue that events/triggers of emotional episodes, appraisals/metacognitions, and subcomponents of dynamic processes are understudied.
  • Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a systematic search strategy or meta-analysis, reports no primary numerical effect sizes, and explicitly excludes other affective dynamics such as variability from its main focus.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1754073915590617

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 41 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Studies using e-diaries and time-sensitive statistics have consistently found heightened affective instability in patients with BPD.

    “Studies of affective instability using e-diaries and time-sensitive statistics have consistently found heightened affective instability in patients with BPD (Ebner-Priemer et al., 2007; Santangelo, Bohus, & Ebner-Priemer, 2012; Santangelo et al., 2014; Trull et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ebner-Priemer et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Santangelo et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Trull et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    BPD patients show higher levels of variability than individuals with MDD.

    “Regarding the first subcomponent, BPD patients show higher levels of variability than individuals with MDD (Trull et al., 2008), perhaps reflecting greater reactivity to external events.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trull et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation

    Because temporal dependency is inversely related to instability, greater temporal dependency may contribute to relatively lower levels of instability observed among MDD versus BPD patients.

    “Because temporal dependency is inversely related to instability (Jahng et al., 2008), greater temporal dependency may contribute to relatively lower levels of instability observed among MDD versus BPD patients.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jahng et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationcitation

    Differences in affective instability may be driven primarily by one of its subcomponents (variability or temporal dependency).

    “Therefore, it is important to distinguish between variability and temporal dependency because differences in affective instability may be driven primarily by one of these subcomponents (Koval et al., 2013; Wang, Hamaker, & Bergeman, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Koval et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang, Hamaker, & Bergeman, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    BPD is the only disorder for which affective instability is a specific diagnostic criterion.

    “Although a number of other mood and anxiety disorders are conceptualized as disorders of distress or emotion dysregulation, BPD is the only disorder for which affective instability is a specific diagnostic criterion (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 12
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Traditional assessment methods (e.g., retrospective questionnaires) and classical statistical indices (e.g., group means) are not well suited for fully capturing within-person processes over time and introduce biases into measurement.

    “However, both traditional assessment methods (e.g. retrospective questionnaires) and classical statistical indices (e.g., group means) are (a) not well suited for fully capturing within-person processes over time and (b) introduce biases into measurement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although BPD and MDD patients both display heightened affective instability relative to controls, instability is more extreme in BPD than MDD.

    “Although BPD and MDD patients both display heightened affective instability relative to controls, instability is more extreme in BPD than MDD (Trull et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trull et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Depression is characterized by heightened temporal dependency of affect (i.e., a high autocorrelation), whereas this is not typical for BPD.

    “Whereas depression is characterized by heightened temporal dependency of affect (i.e., a high autocorrelation), this is not typical for BPD (Houben, van den Noortgate, & Kuppens, in press).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Houben, van den Noortgate, & Kuppens, in press

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Heightened affective instability has been reported in patients with anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, bulimia nervosa, major depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder.

    “For instance, heightened instability has been reported in patients with anxiety disorders (Pfaltz, Michael, Grossman, Margraf, & Wilhelm, 2010), bipolar disorder (Jones, Hare, & Evershed, 2005), bulimia nervosa (Anestis et al., 2010; Selby et al., 2012; Vansteelandt, Probst, & Pieters, 2013), major depression (MDD; Thompson et al., 2012), and posttraumatic stress disorder (Kashdan, Uswatte, Steger”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pfaltz, Michael, Grossman, Margraf, & Wilhelm, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jones, Hare, & Evershed, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Anestis et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dynamic affective processes have historically been neglected in psychopathology research and in behavioral science more generally.

    “Unfortunately, dynamic affective processes have historically been neglected in psychopathology research (Ebner-Priemer & Trull, 2011), and in behavioral science more generally (Molenaar & Campbell, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ebner-Priemer & Trull, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Molenaar & Campbell, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    This review reveals consistent relations between affective instability and a wide range of disorders, between emotion inertia and poorer functioning (primarily increased vulnerability to depression), and between negative emotional (un)differentiation and disorders and features of emotional dysregulation and distress.

    “This review of affective dynamics and psychopathology reveals consistent relations between affective instability and a wide range of disorders, between emotion inertia and poorer functioning (primarily increased vulnerability to depression), and between negative emotional (un)differentiation and disorders and features of emotional dysregulation and distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    When differentiation as a stable individual difference is of interest, measures designed specifically for that purpose are available.

    “When differentiation as a stable individual difference is of interest (e.g., group differences in personality/traits) measures designed specifically for that purpose are available (Kang & Shaver, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kang & Shaver, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    The method used to operationalize emotional differentiation depends crucially on the research question.

    “The method used to operationalize emotional differentiation depends crucially on the research question.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reliably and accurately identifying one's emotions is important because effective emotion regulation relies on selecting a strategy that is appropriate for the specific emotion one is currently experiencing.

    “First, reliably and accurately identifying one’s emotions is important because effective emotion regulation relies on selecting a strategy that is appropriate for the specific emotion one is currently experiencing (Barrett et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barrett et al., 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Almost all of the reviewed studies adjust for intensity of experienced affect in estimating the association between emotional differentiation and various outcomes, making it unlikely that observed differences between clinical and healthy individuals are driven solely by clinical individuals' more extreme affective experiences.

    “It is worthwhile to note that almost all of the reviewed studies adjust for intensity of experienced affect in estimating the association between emotional differentiation and various outcomes, making it unlikely that observed differences between clinical and healthy individuals is driven solely by clinical individuals’ more extreme affective experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Emotional clarity is typically thought of as a stable between-person individual difference intended to be measured cross-sectionally.

    “This again diverges from the concept of emotional clarity, which is typically thought of as a stable between-person individual difference that is intended to be measured cross-sectionally (Boden et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boden et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A larger time frame is less likely to capture the ebb and flow of affect and to reveal the association with psychopathology and its features.

    “A larger time frame is less likely to capture the ebb and flow of affect and to reveal the association with psychopathology and its features.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Between-person differentiation estimates generated from diary and EMA data may serve as useful proxies for investigations of stable individual differences, but there are substantial precision and bias limitations when using these methods.

    “The between-person differentiation estimates generated from diary and EMA data, like those reviewed before, may also serve as useful proxies for such investigations, but we note that there are substantial precision and bias limitations when using these methods (Lane & Trull, in press).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lane & Trull, in press

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Average interitem correlations are less desirable than between-person ICCs, because the former is a special case of the latter in which the assumptions rarely hold.

    “Average interitem correlations are less desirable than between-person ICCs, as the prior is a special case of the latter in which the assumptions rarely hold.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The experience of affect is interpreted in certain, sometimes idiosyncratic ways, and the way in which one responds to this experience is influenced by one's ability to use adaptive coping strategies in the face of strong emotional experience.

    “The experience of affect is also interpreted in certain, sometimes idiosyncratic ways, and the way in which one responds to this experience will also be influenced by one’s ability to use adaptive coping strategies in the face of strong emotional experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tomko et al. (in press) were the first to provide a method for calculating differentiation at the level of experience and to use it to predict dynamic outcomes.

    “In contrast, Tomko et al. (in press) were the first to provide a method for calculating differentiation at the level of experience and utilize it to predict dynamic outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tomko et al. (in press)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Instability, inertia, and emotional differentiation can be indexed at daily and weekly levels as well.

    “Instability, inertia, and emotional differentiation can be indexed at daily and weekly levels as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
17 of 17
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most psychological disorders show some kind of altered affective experience, deficient emotion regulation, or dysfunctional behavior to regulate emotions.

    “However, most psychological disorders show some kind of altered affective experience, deficient emotion regulation, or dysfunctional behavior to regulate emotions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Events and triggers of emotional episodes are rarely assessed in psychopathology research.

    “First, events and triggers of emotional episodes are rarely assessed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Emotional experience is dynamic, not static.

    “Emotional experience is dynamic, not static, and methods that provide multiple microassessments of emotional experience across time and situations can shed light on the dynamic nature of various affective processes that are theorized to be central to the development and course of psychopathology.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Optimal mental health is not simply a function of experiencing more positive than negative affect, on average.

    “Optimal mental health is not simply a function of experiencing more positive than negative affect, on average.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Monitoring and analyzing dynamic processes can be challenging.

    “This is not surprising because monitoring and analyzing dynamic processes can be challenging.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The appraisal of events and the metacognitions of the associated affective processes have been largely neglected in psychopathology research.

    “Second, the appraisal of events and the metacognitions of the associated affective processes have been largely neglected in psychopathology research (but see Thompson et al., 2012).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Human emotions and behavior are dynamic processes that unfold over time in everyday life.

    “human emotions and behavior are dynamic processes that unfold over time in everyday life”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lane S. P., Operationalizing emotional differentiation: A generalizability theory approach

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trull, T. J., Lane, S. P., Koval, P., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Department of Sport and Sport Science and House of Competence, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Corresponding author
Trull, Timothy J.
Venue
Emotion Review
Published
2015-07-09
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
355-361
ISSN
  • 1754-0739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-0747
OpenAlex
W2283355370
Cited by
274
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
24.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P60AA011998, R21AA022099)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
emotional dynamics, neuroticism, emotional inertia, emotion differentiation, psychopathology, emotion regulation, ecological momentary assessment, ambulatory assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review