Cited by 1,553Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesSchool Choice and PerformanceEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development.

Kunter, Mareike, Klusmann, Uta, Baumert, Jürgen, Richter, Dirk, Voss, Thamar, Hachfeld, Axinja·2013·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This study investigates teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge, professional beliefs, work-related motivation, and self-regulation as aspects of their professional competence. Specifically, it examines how these aspects impact instruction and, in turn, student outcomes. In a nationally representative sample of 194 German secondary school mathematics classes, multiple measures were used to assess teacher competence, instructional quality, and students’ achievement and motivation. The effect of teachers’ professional competence on student outcomes was estimated in a 1-year repeated-measures design. Two-level structural equation models revealed positive effects of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge, enthusiasm for teaching, and self-regulatory skills on instructional quality, which in turn affected student outcomes. In contrast, teachers’ general academic ability did not affect their instruction. The multidimensional model of teachers’ professional competence introduced in this article seems suited to stimulate further research on the personal indicators of teacher quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0032583

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A.
Affiliations
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2013-08
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
805-820
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W1976072050
Cited by
1,553
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 154 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 188 · 2021: 183 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 2
FWCI
191.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation (BA1461/2-1; BA1461/2-2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
teacher competence, pedagogical content knowledge, teacher beliefs, teacher motivation, self-regulation, teaching quality, academic performance, student motivation, mathematics education, secondary school teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review