Cited by 2,100Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress

Open access
Baumert, Jürgen, Kunter, Mareike, Blum, Werner, Brunner, Martin, Voss, Thamar, Jordan, Alexander, Klusmann, Uta, Krauss, Stefan +2 more·2010·American Educational Research Journal

Abstract

In both the United States and Europe, concerns have been raised about whether preservice and in-service training succeeds in equipping teachers with the professional knowledge they need to deliver consistently high-quality instruction. This article investigates the significance of teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for high-quality instruction and student progress in secondary-level mathematics. It reports findings from a 1-year study conducted in Germany with a representative sample of Grade 10 classes and their mathematics teachers. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge was theoretically and empirically distinguishable from their content knowledge. Multilevel structural equation models revealed a substantial positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on students’ learning gains that was mediated by the provision of cognitive activation and individual learning support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0002831209345157

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MCK and MPCK are not picked up incidentally but rather developed through university courses, mentoring received during practice teaching and reflection on classroom experience.

    “Baumert et al. (2010:139) argue that MCK and MPCK are not picked up incidentally but rather developed through university courses, mentoring received during practice teaching and “reflection on classroom experience”.”

    From Mentoring and preparing primary school mathematics teachers (2020) · cites this paper as Baumert et al. (2010:139)

  • Teachers' discipline-specific knowledge is dynamic.

    “Teachers' discipline-specific knowledge is dynamic (Baumert et al., 2010)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2010-03
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
133-180
ISSN
  • 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1011
OpenAlex
W2141462352
Cited by
2,100
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 155 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 66
FWCI
165.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge, cognitive activation, learning gains, secondary mathematics instruction, teacher professional knowledge, mathematics teachers, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review