Cited by 156Stress and Burnout ResearchJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorOccupational Health and Burnout

Does basic need satisfaction mediate the link between stress exposure and well-being? A diary study among beginning teachers

Open access
Aldrup, Karen, Klusmann, Uta, Lüdtke, Oliver·2017·Learning and Instruction

Abstract

An imbalance between work-related stressors and resources, which we refer to as stress exposure, is often found to impair teachers' occupational well-being. However, the psychological mechanisms that explain this relationship are mostly unknown. We assumed that satisfaction of the basic psychological needs for competence, relatedness with students, and relatedness with colleagues acts as a mediator. To test this assumption, we conducted a two-week diary study with 152 beginning teachers. A multilevel within-subject mediation analysis showed that teachers felt less work enthusiasm and more emotional exhaustion on days when stress exposure was high. Whereas the needs for competence and relatedness with students explained the association with work enthusiasm, the need for competence mediated the relationship with emotional exhaustion. Additionally, the least experienced teachers felt more emotional exhaustion when the need for relatedness with students was not satisfied. These findings add to our understanding of the daily intra-individual processes affecting beginning teachers' occupational well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.005

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive teacher-student relationships were found to be supportive for teacher well-being.

    “Generally, positive teacher-student relationships were found to be supportive for TWB”
  • Fulfillment of the need for competence and relatedness with students and colleagues mediated between stress exposure and teacher well-being.

    “not only fulfillment of the need for competence but also relatedness with students and colleagues was found to mediate between stress exposure and TWB (Aldrup et al., 2017)”
  • Fulfillment of basic needs, including relatedness with colleagues and students, autonomy, and competence, mediated the relationship between perceived autonomy support and different operationalizations of teacher well-being.

    “the fulfillment of basic needs (relatedness with colleagues and students, autonomy and competence) was shown to mediate the relationship between perceived autonomy support and different operationalizations of TWB”
  • The four studies that applied daily diaries covered a minimum of five to a maximum of 10 working days.

    “the four studies that applied daily diaries (Aldrup et al., 2017;Lavy & Eshet, 2018;Simbula, 2010;Tadić Vujčić et al., 2017) covered a minimum of five to a maximum of 10 working days.”
  • Subjective professional competence is positively related to teacher well-being, whereas objective teaching experience is of limited exploratory power.

    “subjective professional competence is positively related to TWB (Aldrup et al., 2017;Collie et al., 2015;Wong & Zhang, 2014;Yıldırım, 2014), whereas objective teaching experience is of limited exploratory power.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. KMK. (2004). Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 16.12.2004 [Standards for teacher education: Educational sciences. Resolution of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the States in the Federal Republic of Germany on 12/16/2004].
  2. Muth en, L. K., & Muth en, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide: Seventh edition. Los Angeles: Muth en & Muth en.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., & Lüdtke, O.
Affiliations
Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)
Corresponding author
Aldrup, Karen
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
50
Pages
21-30
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2557932591
Cited by
156
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
basic psychological needs, stress exposure, employee well-being, novice teachers, work enthusiasm, emotional exhaustion, need for competence, occupational stressors, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review