Cited by 194Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisEthics, Aesthetics, and ArtMedia Influence and Health

Why we like to watch sad films. The pleasure of being moved in aesthetic experiences.

Open access
Hanich, Julian, Wagner, Valentin, Shah, Mira, Jacobsen, Thomas, Menninghaus, Winfried·2014·Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Abstract

This article investigates an age-old, puzzling question: how can a negatively valenced emotion such as sadness go together with aesthetic liking and even pleasure? We propose that an answer to this question must take into account the feeling of being moved, a complex emotional state that plays a major role in the history of poetics and aesthetics and has recently begun to attract interest in psychological research. We conducted a study in an actual cinema using film clips as sadness-eliciting stimuli. In total, 76 participants watched 38 clips that presented variations of the same sad scenario: a character or a group of characters learns about the death of a close person. The study revealed a highly significant positive correlation between sadness and enjoyment. However, this correlation was almost fully mediated by the feeling of being moved. Hence sadness primarily functions as a contributor to and intensifier of the emotional state of being moved. Furthermore, the study revealed that being moved is a positive term in two senses. First, it refers to an overall positive feeling. Second, it indicates a positive value judgment regarding the power of a film to elicit such feelings. Therefore, we conclude that it is the overall positive feeling of being moved itself that recipients of sad films and other forms of art enjoy—we simply like to be moved. Taken together, our findings are significant for investigations of the so-called ‘sad-film paradox’ and the aesthetic pleasure associated with negative emotions more generally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0035690

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanich, J., Wagner, V., Shah, M., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Venue
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Published
2014-05
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
130-143
ISSN
  • 1931-3896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-390X
OpenAlex
W2020170657
Cited by
194
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
being moved, aesthetic pleasure, sadness, aesthetic preference, film enjoyment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review