Cited by 55Emotions and Moral BehaviorPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The bad things we do because of empathy

Open access
Breithaupt, Fritz·2018·Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Abstract

Empathy is usually seen as a prosocial and morally positive influence on behaviour. This article provides an overview of cases of negative acts motivated by empathy. It includes discussions of polarizations that are fueled by side-taking and empathy, selfish forms of empathy (such as sadistic empathy, vampirism, and helicopter parenting), and filtered empathy (using identification with a third person as a medium to have empathy with another). The definition of empathy used is to co-experience the situation of another.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03080188.2018.1450928

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empathy and Theory of Mind can be used for manipulation and deception.

    “Although empathy and ToM are often associated with prosocial virtues, both abilities can be used for manipulation and deception (e.g.Bloom, 2016;Breithaupt, 2018;Bubandt & Willerslev, 2015;Ding et al., 2015;Imuta et al., 2016;Lee & Imuta, 2021;Vermeule, 2010).”

    From The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition (2021) · cites this paper as Breithaupt, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breithaupt, F.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Breithaupt, Fritz
Venue
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Published
2018-06
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
166-174
ISSN
  • 0308-0188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-2790
OpenAlex
W2800500554
Cited by
55
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Interdisciplinary Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
empathy, negative behavior, prosocial behavior, vampirism, helicopter parenting, identification, moral psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review