Cited by 68Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and AccessPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Mental health services in the medical home in the Department of Veterans Affairs: Factors for successful integration.

Pomerantz, Andrew S., Kearney, Lisa K., Wray, Laura O., Post, Edward P., McCarthy, John F.·2014·Psychological Services

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, primary care has been described as the de facto mental health care system in the United States. Most individuals with mental health concerns present in primary care, but the majority are either not identified or do not receive evidence-based services or guideline concordant care. Despite 20 years of research supporting the integration of mental health services into primary care, the translation of this evidence into real-world settings remains limited. The growing impetus to build comprehensive health care systems that provide care for a defined population has recently spurred interest in providing mental health care within primary care. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began to systematically incorporate psychological and other mental health services into primary care in 2007. National evaluation and local program data reviewed here have demonstrated that the initiative has already improved the identification and treatment of mental health disorders in the primary care population, increased the likelihood of receiving guideline concordant care, and enhanced treatment engagement for patients referred into specialty mental health services. These results provide support for expectations that integrated care enhances access to high-quality mental health care. This article summarizes critical factors for success identified in the VA integrated care rollout. These factors are applicable for other health care organizations that seek to improve mental h…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0036638

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pomerantz, A. S., Kearney, L. K., Wray, L. O., Post, E. P., & McCarthy, J. F.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Psychological Services
Published
2014
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
243-253
ISSN
  • 1541-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-148X
OpenAlex
W2324300369
Cited by
68
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
mental health services, primary care, integrated care, patient-centered medical home, Department of Veterans Affairs, veterans, mental health service delivery, guideline-concordant care, treatment engagement, access to mental health care, implementation factors
MeSH terms
Humans, Mental Health Services, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Patient-Centered Care, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review