Cited by 65Aging and Gerontology ResearchOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Does positivity operate when the stakes are high? Health status and decision making among older adults.

Open access
English, Tammy, Carstensen, Laura L.·2015·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Research and theory suggest that emotional goals are increasingly prioritized with age. Related empirical work has shown that, compared with younger adults, older adults attend to and remember positive information more than negative information. This age-related positivity effect has been eliminated in experiments that have explicitly demanded processing of both positive and negative information. In the present study, we explored whether a reduction of the preference for positive information over negative information appears when the material being reviewed holds personal relevance for the individual. Older participants whose health varied from poor to very good reviewed written material prior to making decisions about health related and non-health-related issues. As predicted, older adults in relatively poor health (compared with those in relatively good health) showed less positivity in review of information while making health-related decisions. In contrast, positivity emerged regardless of health status for decisions that were unrelated to health. Across decision contexts, those individuals who focused more on positive information than negative information reported better postdecisional mood and greater decision satisfaction. Results are consistent with the theoretical argument that the age-related positivity effect reflects goal-directed cognitive processing and, furthermore, suggests that personal relevance and contextual factors determine whether positivity emerges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0039121

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although aging itself is not associated with decline in affective functioning, aged individuals, compared with the young, are more vulnerable to depressive symptoms associated with physical illnesses and life events.

    “Although aging itself is not associated with decline in affective functioning, aged individuals, compared with the young, are more vulnerable to depressive symptoms associated with physical illnesses, and life events (English and Carstensen, 2015;Fiske et al, 2009Fiske et al, , 2013)).”

    From Microglia Priming with Aging and Stress (2017) · cites this paper as English and Carstensen, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
English, T., & Carstensen, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2015-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
348-355
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2323922395
Cited by
65
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R37-AG008816; F32-AG034783)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
positivity effect, older adults, health status, decision-making, emotional goals, personal relevance, decision satisfaction, age differences
MeSH terms
Optimism, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Decision Making, Female, Goals, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Self Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review