The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis.
Abstract
Feedback has been studied as a strategy for promoting energy conservation for more than 30 years, with studies reporting widely varying results. Literature reviews have suggested that the effectiveness of feedback depends on both how and to whom it is provided; yet variations in both the type of feedback provided and the study methodology have made it difficult for conclusions to be drawn. The current article analyzes past theoretical and empirical research on both feedback and proenvironmental behavior to identify unresolved issues, and utilizes a meta-analysis of 42 feedback studies published between 1976 and 2010 to test a set of hypotheses about when and how feedback about energy usage is most effective. Results indicate that feedback is effective overall, r = .071, p < .001, but with significant variation in effects (r varied from -.080 to .480). Several treatment variables were found to moderate this relationship, including frequency, medium, comparison message, duration, and combination with other interventions (e.g., goal, incentive). Overall, results provide further evidence of feedback as a promising strategy to promote energy conservation and suggest areas in which future research should focus to explore how and for whom feedback is most effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE
Simon, H. A. (1955) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884852 · Cited by 15,877
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 1×
“The principle of compatibility (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977) suggests behaviors and their influences should be measured at the same level of specificity.”
BackgroundKluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Normative Influences on Altruism
Schwartz, S. H. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60358-5 · Cited by 5,364
Cited by
Financial Education Affects Financial Knowledge and Downstream Behaviors
Kaiser, T., Lusardi, A., Menkhoff, L., & Urban, C. (2022) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.022 · Cited by 508
Nudging pro‐environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities
Byerly, H., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P. J., Hammond Wagner, C., Palchak, E., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T. H., Schwartz, A. J., & Fisher, B. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1777 · Cited by 361
What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
Stanley, T. D., Carter, E. C., & Doucouliagos, H. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000169 · Cited by 307
I saw the sign: Promoting energy conservation via normative prompts
Bergquist, M., & Nilsson, A. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.005 · Cited by 92
Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Sareen, S., & Geels, F. W. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102272 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1205-1227
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2413028598
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 62.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0039650
- The paper
- Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R. (2015). The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039650
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
