Cited by 36Counseling Practices and SupervisionPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCultural Differences and Values

Cultural adaptations of psychotherapy: Therapists' applications of conceptual models with Asians and Asian Americans

Open access
Hall, Gordon C. Nagayama, Kim-Mozeleski, Jin E., Zane, Nolan W., Sato, Hiroshi, Huang, Ellen R., Tuan, Mia, Ibaraki, Alicia Y.·2019·Asian American Journal of Psychology

Abstract

= 6), a predominantly collectivistic society. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews revealed that interdependent conceptualizations of the self and indirect communication were addressed by therapists in both countries, and therapist credibility issues were addressed only by therapists in the United States. These results imply that when culturally adapting psychotherapy, therapists incorporate elements of conceptual models that are relevant to their clients' cultures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/aap0000122

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ABFT's focus on the family might be more acceptable to those from less individualistic cultures.

    “Moreover, ABFT’s focus on the family might be more acceptable to those from less individualistic cultures (51, 52).”

    From Combining attachment-based family therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy to improve outcomes for adolescents with anxiety (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says therapists adapted CBT’s individual focus to accommodate clients’ interdependent social and family contexts, particularly in Japan. This supports the rationale for a family focus, but the paper does not assess ABFT or whether it is more acceptable to clients from less individualistic cultures. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, G. C. N., Kim-Mozeleski, J. E., Zane, N. W., Sato, H., Huang, E. R., Tuan, M., & Ibaraki, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Kwansei Gakuin University (JP)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Western Oregon University (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Gordon C. Nagayama
Venue
Asian American Journal of Psychology
Published
2019-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
68-78
ISSN
  • 1948-1985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-1993
OpenAlex
W2850812527
Cited by
36
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Asian American Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH073511)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
cultural adaptation of psychotherapy, conceptual model, Asian Americans, collectivism, interdependent self-concept, indirect communication, therapist credibility, cross-cultural psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review