Cited by 28Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Traits and Psychology

Extraversion and interpersonal support as risk, resource, and protective factors in the prediction of unipolar mood and anxiety disorders.

Open access
Metts, Allison, Zinbarg, Richard, Hammen, Constance, Mineka, Susan, Craske, Michelle G.·2021·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Whereas there is extensive research on factors that contribute to vulnerability for depression and anxiety, research on how to promote mental health or offset risk effects in individuals likely to develop these disorders is lacking. Resilience models focus on risk, resource, and protective factors and their relationships. The current longitudinal study evaluated whether extraversion and interpersonal support functioned in resource or protective roles in relation to unipolar mood disorder (UMD), anxiety disorder (AD), and comorbid diagnoses. Data from 534 adolescents over a 3-year period were examined in a series of survival analyses to predict future disorder onset. The linear effect of extraversion significantly interacted with neuroticism predicting UMD diagnoses with extraversion conferring protection and introversion conferring risk at high levels of neuroticism. The quadratic effect of extraversion significantly interacted with neuroticism predicting AD and comorbid diagnoses such that extraversion escalated risk for diagnoses at high levels of neuroticism. The quadratic effect of extraversion was significant in comorbidity models, demonstrating increased risk as one progresses from slight extraversion to extreme introversion, independent of neuroticism. Interpersonal support significantly predicted UMD, AD, and comorbid diagnoses in an approximately linear fashion. Specificity tests indicated that these effects remained when including the other diagnosis in each model. Findings suggest the value of attending to extraverted traits and encouraging social connection regardless of risk status in prevention and treatment approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000643

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Craske MG (2003). Origins of phobias and anxiety disorders: Why more women than men?. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
  2. Eysenck HJ (1983). Psychophysiology and personality: Extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism. In Individual differences and psychopathology (pp. 13– 30). London, England: Academic Press.
  3. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, & Williams JBW (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, research version, non-patient edition (SCID-I/NP). New York, NY: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  4. Fraser MW, & Terzian MA (2005). Risk and resilience in child development: Practice principles and strategies. In Mallon GP & McCartt Hess P (Eds.), Handbook of children, youth, and family services: Practice, policies, and programs (pp. 55– 71). New York: Columbia University Press.
  5. Goldberg LR (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Mervielde I, Deary I, De Fruyt F, & Ostendorf F (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7– 28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
  6. Kendler KS, Gatz M, Gardner CO, & Pederson NL (2006). Personality and major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 1113– 1120. 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820230023002 17015813 · DOI
  7. Nolen-Hoeksema S (1990). Sex differences in depression. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  8. Wilt J, & Revelle W (2017). Extraversion. In Widiger TA (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 57– 81). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Metts, A., Zinbarg, R., Hammen, C., Mineka, S., & Craske, M. G.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2021-01
Volume
130
Issue
1
Pages
47-59
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W3104803448
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH65651, R01 MH65652)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
extraversion, neuroticism, interpersonal support, unipolar mood disorders, anxiety disorders, comorbidities, depression, resilience, risk factors, protective factors, adolescents, mental health promotion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Chicago, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Social Support, Los Angeles, Cohort Studies, Mood Disorders, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review