Cited by 45Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

A longitudinal study of personality traits, anxiety, and depressive disorders in young adults

Open access
Prince, Elizabeth J., Siegel, Daniel J., Carroll, C. Patrick, Sher, Kenneth J., Bienvenu, O. Joseph·2021·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

BACKGROUND: How personality traits, anxiety, and depressive disorders relate longitudinally has implications for etiologic research and prevention. We sought to determine how neuroticism and extraversion relate to first-onset anxiety and depressive disorders in young adults. DESIGN: An inception cohort of 489 university freshmen was followed for 6 years. METHOD: Participants self-reported personality traits using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Anxiety and depressive disorders were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. RESULTS: Baseline neuroticism predicted first-onset panic disorder, agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and major depressive disorder (MDD), while introversion predicted first-onset agoraphobia (moderate-large effects). Participants who developed panic disorder, agoraphobia, GAD, or MDD had increases in neuroticism if the disorder was current at follow-up (moderate-large effects). Participants who developed MDD but were in remission by follow-up had a moderate increase in neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: High neuroticism in young adulthood is either a true risk factor, or marker of risk, for first-onset anxiety and depressive disorders, as is low extraversion for agoraphobia. The current data suggest large neuroticism "state" effects for panic disorder, agoraphobia, and MDD, and moderate "scar" effects from MDD. Though many clinicians and researchers regard personality traits simply as "vulnerability" factors, longitudinal analyses suggest additional complexity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2020.1845431

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic factors, the personality of the individual, and stressful life events could cause anxiety.

    “In terms of the causes of anxiety both genetic (Meier et al., 2019), the personality of the individual (Prince et al., 2021) as well as stressful life events could cause anxiety (Miloyan et al., 2018).”

    From A Systematic Review of “Helicopter Parenting” and Its Relationship With Anxiety and Depression (2022) · cites this paper as Prince et al., 2021

    The Prince et al. citation attaches to the personality portion of the sentence, not to genetic factors or stressful life events. The Discussion reports that higher neuroticism predicted first-onset anxiety disorders in young adults, but the Conclusions say it could be either a true risk factor or a marker of risk. The source therefore supports an association with specific personality traits, not an established causal role for personality generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prince, E. J., Siegel, D. J., Carroll, C. P., Sher, K. J., & Bienvenu, O. J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Prince, Elizabeth J.
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2020-11-15
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
299-307
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W3106096360
Cited by
42
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Health (K23MH64543, K05 AA017242, R37AA7231)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
personality traits, neuroticism, extraversion, introversion, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, panic disorder, agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, young adults, university students, risk factors, remission, state effects
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Adolescent, Adult, Agoraphobia, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personality, Personality Inventory, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review