The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.
Open accessAbstract
Few industries match the scale of health care. In the United States alone, an estimated 85% of the population has at least 1 health care encounter annually and at least one quarter of these people experience 4 to 9 encounters annually. A single visit requires collaboration among a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, administrative staff, patients, and their loved ones. Multiple visits often occur across different clinicians working in different organizations. Ineffective care coordination and the underlying suboptimal teamwork processes are a public health issue. Health care delivery systems exemplify complex organizations operating under high stakes in dynamic policy and regulatory environments. The coordination and delivery of safe, high-quality care demands reliable teamwork and collaboration within, as well as across, organizational, disciplinary, technical, and cultural boundaries. In this review, we synthesize the evidence examining teams and teamwork in health care delivery settings in order to characterize the current state of the science and to highlight gaps in which studies can further illuminate our evidence-based understanding of teamwork and collaboration. Specifically, we highlight evidence concerning (a) the relationship between teamwork and multilevel outcomes, (b) effective teamwork behaviors, (c) competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills, and attitudes) underlying effective teamwork in the health professions, (d) teamwork interventions, (e) team performance measurement strategies, and (f) the critical role context plays in shaping teamwork and collaboration in practice. We also distill potential avenues for future research and highlight opportunities to understand the translation, dissemination, and implementation of evidence-based teamwork principles into practice. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“we constructed a simulation using 3 to 4 different agents, representing a typical clinical team composition [31].”
From Mitigating cognitive biases in clinical decision-making through multi-agent conversations using large language models: simulation study (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wall, A. (2000) · British Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.9.19311 · Cited by 5,912
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US
Makary, M. A., & Daniel, M. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i2139 · Cited by 3,264
Estimating Health Care-Associated Infections and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002
Klevens, R. M., Edwards, J. R., Richards, C. L., Horan, T. C., Gaynes, R. P., Pollock, D. A., & Cardo, D. M. (2007) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1177/003335490712200205 · Cited by 2,963
The Quality in Australian Health Care Study
Wilson, R. M., Runciman, W. B., Gibberd, R. W., Harrison, B. T., Newby, L., & Hamilton, J. D. (1995) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124691.x · Cited by 2,480
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.413 · Cited by 2,385
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Sexton, J. B., Helmreich, R. L., Neilands, T. B., Rowan, K., Vella, K., Boyden, J., Roberts, P. R., & Thomas, E. J. (2006) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-44 · Cited by 1,932
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
Pharmacist Participation on Physician Rounds and Adverse Drug Events in the Intensive Care Unit
Leape, L. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.3.267 · Cited by 1,606
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2016, 11). Hospital survey on patient safety culture. Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospital/index.html 21249886
- Arthur W, Day EA, Bennett W, & Portrey AM (Eds.). (2013). Individual and team skill decay: The science and implications for practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Cannon-Bowers J, Tannenbaum S, Salas E, & Volpe C (1995). Defining team competencies: Implications for training requirements and strategies In Guzzo R & Salas E (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333– 380). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Institute of Medicine. (2015). Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 26803876
- Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, & Donaldson MS (Eds.). (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system (Vol. 6). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 25077248
- Rosen MA, Schiebel N, Salas E, Wu TS, Silvestri S, & King HB (2012). How can team performance be measured, assessed, and diagnosed In Salas E & Flush K (Eds.), Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training (pp. 59– 79). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Weaver SJ, Feitosa J, & Salas E (2013). The science of teams: The theoretical drivers, models, and competencies of team performance for patient safety In Salas E & Frush K (Eds.), Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training (pp. 3– 26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Madar, J., Roehr, C. C., Ainsworth, S. B., Ersdal, H. L., Morley, C. J., Rüdiger, M., Skåre, C., Szczapa, T., Pas, A. B. T., Trevisanuto, D., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.014 · Cited by 521
Petersson, L., Larsson, I., Nygren, J. M., Nilsen, P., Neher, M., Reed, J. E., Tyskbo, D., & Svedberg, P. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08215-8 · Cited by 434
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Education for resuscitation
Greif, R. T., Lockey, A. S., Breckwoldt, J., Carmona, F., Conaghan, P., Kuzovlev, A. N., Pflanzl-Knizacek, L., Sári, F., Shammet, S., Scapigliati, A., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.016 · Cited by 376
The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead.
Salas, E., Reyes, D. L., & McDaniel, S. H. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000334 · Cited by 461
Cheng, A., Magid, D. J., Auerbach, M. A., Bhanji, F., Bigham, B. L., Blewer, A. L., Dainty, K. N., Diederich, E., Lin, Y., Leary, M., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000903 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Dietz, A. S., Benishek, L. E., Thompson, D., Pronovost, P. J., & Weaver, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- National Cancer Institute (UA)
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 433-450
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- PMC
- PMC6361117
- OpenAlex
- W2803733393
- Cited by
- 1,283
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 167 · 2025: 218 · 2024: 249 · 2023: 182 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 13
- FWCI
- 111.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002649)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- healthcare teamwork, care coordination, patient safety, quality of care, teamwork behavior, teamwork skills, team performance measurement, organizational context, multidisciplinary collaboration, evidence-based practice implementation
- MeSH terms
- Cooperative Behavior, Delivery of Health Care, Group Processes, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Patient Care Team, Quality of Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review