The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical supervision—The missing ingredient
Abstract
Clinical supervision is acknowledged as a distinct professional competence that requires specific education and training. However, it is all too often an inadequately addressed or an entirely missing ingredient in psychology curricula and clinical research, including, for example, clinical trial protocols and evidence-based treatment implementation. It is proposed that clinical supervision training follow the shift to the competence movement that has occurred in psychology education, training, and regulation generally and embrace a systematic and intentional competence model. Groundwork for such a competence model for supervision has been laid in the supervision guidelines from the American Psychological Association and the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, defining parameters for clinical supervision and the requisite supervisor competencies. This article discusses these inadequately addressed or missing ingredients, the insufficiently organized approach to supervision as a distinct competency at the present time, and the assumptions that are obstacles to progress. Strategies are proposed to overcome these obstacles; for example, methods of infusing supervision into existing curricula, the hidden curriculum, and transformational leadership that would guide its implementation. Knowledge, skills, and attitudes would be systematically developed as a critical component of self-reflective competency-based education, a portal to lifelong learning, and an essen…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Competency-based approaches emphasize accountability, risk management, and discrete skill acquisition, frequently treating culture as a single competency domain rather than a structural condition that shapes all aspects of training (Falender, 2018;Falender & Shafranske, 2023;Rothwell et al., 2021).”
From Caught between silence and truth: Graduate trainees' disclosures of microaggressions (2026) · cites this paper as Falender, 2018
Citations
Cites
An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers
Walfish, S., McAlister, B., O'Donnell, P., & Lambert, M. J. (2012) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/02.07.17.pr0.110.2.639-644 · Cited by 394
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Caught between silence and truth: Graduate trainees' disclosures of microaggressions
Concepción Cabán, L. D., Goins, R. E., Osman, F. A., Banks, B. M., Jackson, T. M., Flint, A. N., Hynes, K., & Peterson, K. R. (2026) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101593
Metadata
- Authors
- Falender, C. A.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1240-1250
- ISSN
- 1935-990X
- 0003-066X
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review