Cited by 41Attachment and Relationship DynamicsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Communication and Language

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Any time and place? Digital emotional support for digital natives.

Colasante, Tyler, Lin, Lauren, De France, Kalee, Hollenstein, Tom·2022·American Psychologist

Abstract

Digital natives (i.e., those who have grown up in the digital age) are likely to receive emotional support through digital means, such as texting and video calling. However, virtually all studies assessing the benefits of emotional support have focused on in-person support; the relative efficacy of digital support remains unclear. This study assessed a sample of young adults' negative emotions, digital and in-person support for those emotions, and success in regulating them 3 times per day for 14 days (N = 164; 6,530 collective measurement occasions). Participants' social surroundings at the time of each negative emotion and trait levels of social avoidance were also considered. Digital support was expected to be received more often and perceived as more effective for regulating negative emotions when participants were alone and higher in social avoidance. However, with the exception of those higher in social avoidance receiving less digital (and in-person) support, digital support was received and perceived as effective regardless of these factors, and its perceived effectiveness was on par with that of in-person support. For digital natives, digital support may be just as effective as the "real thing" and its benefits may not be restricted to isolated or socially avoidant users. Findings are discussed in relation to the emotional consequences and social constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. If transcending the time and space limitations of in-person support with digital support is the new norm, the good news is that it seems to be working. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/amp0000708

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Colasante, T., Lin, L., De France, K., & Hollenstein, T.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2022-02
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
186-195
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W3088739152
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (04560-2017)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
Keywords
digital natives, negative emotions, emotion regulation, social avoidance, text messaging, video calls, young adults, COVID-19 pandemic, social isolation
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Emotions, Humans, Social Behavior, Young Adult, Pandemics, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review