Cited by 173AI and HR TechnologiesOnline Learning and AnalyticsEmployer Branding and e-HRM

Using machine learning to translate applicant work history into predictors of performance and turnover

Open access
Sajjadiani, Sima, Sojourner, Aaron J., Kammeyer-Mueller, John D., Mykerezi, Elton·2019·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Work history information reflected in resumes and job application forms is commonly used to screen job applicants; however, there is little consensus as to how to systematically translate information about one's work-related past into predictors of future work outcomes. In this article, we apply machine learning techniques to job application form data (including previous job descriptions and stated reasons for changing jobs) to develop interpretable measures of work experience relevance, tenure history, and history of involuntary turnover, history of avoiding bad jobs, and history of approaching better jobs. We empirically examine our model on a longitudinal sample of 16,071 applicants for public school teaching positions, and predict subsequent work outcomes including student evaluations, expert observations of performance, value-added to student test scores, voluntary turnover, and involuntary turnover. We found that work experience relevance and a history of approaching better jobs were linked to positive work outcomes, whereas a history of avoiding bad jobs was associated with negative outcomes. We also quantify the extent to which our model can improve the quality of selection process above the conventional methods of assessing work history, while lowering the risk of adverse impact. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0000405

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algorithms may facilitate employees' dismissal through the prediction of employee behaviors such as departure, performance, or deviant behaviors such as fraud.

    “Second, if not taking or implementing the termination decision, algorithms may facilitate employees' dismissal through the prediction of employee behaviors such as departure (Punnose & Ajit, 2016;Rosenbaum, 2019;Sajjadiani et al., 2019;Sikaroudi, Mohammad, Ghousi, & Sikaroudi, 2015;Zhao, Hryniewicki, Cheng, Fu, & Zhu, 2018), performance (Edwards & Edwards, 2019;Greenfield, 2018;Sajjadiani et al.,”

    From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Sajjadiani et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sajjadiani, S., Sojourner, A. J., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Mykerezi, E.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2019-10
Volume
104
Issue
10
Pages
1207-1225
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2970702233
Cited by
173
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R305H160036)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
job application forms, involuntary turnover, voluntary turnover, job performance prediction, student assessment, value added, public school teaching, adverse impact, model interpretability
MeSH terms
Work Performance, Machine Learning, School Teachers, Adult, Female, Humans, Job Application, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personnel Turnover, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review