The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using machine learning to translate applicant work history into predictors of performance and turnover
Open accessAbstract
Work history information reflected in resumes and job application forms is commonly used to screen job applicants; however, there is little consensus as to how to systematically translate information about one's work-related past into predictors of future work outcomes. In this article, we apply machine learning techniques to job application form data (including previous job descriptions and stated reasons for changing jobs) to develop interpretable measures of work experience relevance, tenure history, and history of involuntary turnover, history of avoiding bad jobs, and history of approaching better jobs. We empirically examine our model on a longitudinal sample of 16,071 applicants for public school teaching positions, and predict subsequent work outcomes including student evaluations, expert observations of performance, value-added to student test scores, voluntary turnover, and involuntary turnover. We found that work experience relevance and a history of approaching better jobs were linked to positive work outcomes, whereas a history of avoiding bad jobs was associated with negative outcomes. We also quantify the extent to which our model can improve the quality of selection process above the conventional methods of assessing work history, while lowering the risk of adverse impact. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Second, if not taking or implementing the termination decision, algorithms may facilitate employees' dismissal through the prediction of employee behaviors such as departure (Punnose & Ajit, 2016;Rosenbaum, 2019;Sajjadiani et al., 2019;Sikaroudi, Mohammad, Ghousi, & Sikaroudi, 2015;Zhao, Hryniewicki, Cheng, Fu, & Zhu, 2018), performance (Edwards & Edwards, 2019;Greenfield, 2018;Sajjadiani et al.,”
From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Sajjadiani et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885 · cited 1×
“To test this assumption, we run the Grambsch and Therneau (1994) maximum likelihood test.”
MethodTransfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309352880 · Cited by 1,477
Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience.
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000033 · Cited by 1,031 · cited 1×
“Moreover, it is also possible that individuals who attribute previous quitting to problems with their former workplace are behaviorally prone to externalize blame for negative events (Maier & Seligman, 2016).”
BackgroundApplicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta‐Analysis
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x · Cited by 816
Papay, J. P., & Kraft, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.008 · Cited by 370
Searching for Effective Teachers with Imperfect Information
Staiger, D. O., & Rockoff, J. E. (2010) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.24.3.97 · Cited by 345 · cited 1×
“Improved selection might reduce our need to learn about teacher performance on the backs of children (Staiger & Rockoff, 2010).”
BackgroundA meta-analytic examination of work and general locus of control.
Wang, Q., Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017707 · Cited by 292
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., & Trichina, E. (2022) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398 · Cited by 1,134
“Consistent with this view, Sajjadiani et al. (2019) suggest that machine learning can greatly assist HR practitioners and firms by transforming the selection process into a more systematic process by eliminating the occurrence of recruiters ’ biases or even applicants ’ influence methods to deviate…”
BackgroundKöchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w · Cited by 511
“Applicating machine learning and statistical test in an empirical-quantitative setting, Sajjadiani et al. (2019) suggest analyzing and developing interpretable measures that are integrated with a substantial body of knowledge already present in the field of selection and established selection…”
MethodAlgorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs
Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Parker, S. K. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 · Cited by 512
Text Preprocessing for Text Mining in Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations
Hickman, L., Thapa, S., Tay, L., Cao, M., & Srinivasan, P. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120971683 · Cited by 449
“…in organizational research and practice (e.g., Li, 2019) because it can be used to improve employee selection and assessment (Campion et al., 2016; Sajjadiani et al., 2019; Speer, 2018) and advance organizational theory by helping researchers uncover emergent processes, develop new classification…”
BackgroundWoods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1681401 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Sajjadiani, S., Sojourner, A. J., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Mykerezi, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1207-1225
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2970702233
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 19.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Minnesota
- Institute of Education Sciences (R305H160036)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Keywords
- job application forms, involuntary turnover, voluntary turnover, job performance prediction, student assessment, value added, public school teaching, adverse impact, model interpretability
- MeSH terms
- Work Performance, Machine Learning, School Teachers, Adult, Female, Humans, Job Application, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personnel Turnover, Data Mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review