Cited by 40Higher Education and EmployabilityEmployer Branding and e-HRMSocial and Cultural Dynamics

Class advantage in the white-collar labor market: an investigation of social class background, job search strategies, and job search success

Fang, Ray T., Saks, Alan M.·2021·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

We proposed that individuals from upper-class backgrounds are more effective at job search than their working-class counterparts in the white-collar labor market. We further proposed that this is partly because upper-class individuals adopt different job search strategies. Our predictions were tested with a time-lagged multisource survey (Study 1) and a 4-wave, 2-month longitudinal survey (Study 2) of business student job seekers. Study 1 found that parental income strengthened the relationship between job search intensity and job search success and that this interaction was mediated by a less haphazard job search strategy. Parental income also strengthened the relationship between job interviews and job offers. Study 2 mostly replicated these findings while showing that the effects generalize to other facets of class background. Study 2 additionally explored mechanisms for why working-class individuals use a more haphazard job search strategy. Although class background positively predicted social capital and social capital negatively predicted a haphazard strategy, social capital did not mediate the negative relationship between class background and a haphazard strategy. Finally, although working-class individuals use a more haphazard strategy on average, exploratory analyses show that those with high psychological capital start with a more haphazard strategy but progress to a low haphazard strategy within two months-on par with upper-class individuals. Conversely, working-class individuals with low psychological capital maintained a more haphazard approach over time. Our findings add new insights into how individuals can conduct a more effective job search and why class inequality remains so durable. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0000842

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A one-month time lag was used to maximize participation and minimize common method bias.

    “We elected to use a one-month time lag to maximize respondents' participation and to minimize common method bias (Podsakoff et al., 2012), consistent with similar studies in the management and entrepreneurship literature (Fang and Saks, 2021;Hong et al., 2021;Mitchell et al., 2018).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, R. T., & Saks, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2021-11
Volume
106
Issue
11
Pages
1695-1713
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W3096120681
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
Keywords
social class, job search strategies, job search success, parental income, social capital, psychological capital, class inequality, business students, job interviews, job offers
MeSH terms
Humans, Occupations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Class, Students, Social Capital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review