Cited by 52Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Phenotypic characterization of nonsocial behavioral impairment in neurexin 1α knockout rats.

Esclassan, Frederic, Francois, Jennifer, Phillips, Keith G., Loomis, Sally, Gilmour, Gary·2015·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Neurexins are neuronal presynaptic proteins that play a key role in mediation of synapse formation. Heterozygous partial deletions in the neurexin-1 gene (NRXN1, 2p16.3) have been observed in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) patients. NRXN1-α knockout (KO) mice present behavioral impairments that resemble some of the core ASD symptoms of social impairment and inflexibility/stereotypy. At present, a thorough assessment of cognitive function has yet to be completed. Rats, containing a biallelic deletion of the NRNX1-α gene on a Sprague Dawley background were compared to littermate wild types across a range of tasks designed to test functional domains disrupted in ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders, including sensory perception (prepulse inhibition), attention (latent inhibition), associative learning (instrumental and Pavlovian conditioning), and memory (rewarded alternation T maze and spatial discrimination). NRXN1α KO rats were found to present with large and persistent nonsocial deficits, including hyperactivity, deficits in simple instrumental learning, latent inhibition, and spatial-dependent learning. No deficit in sensorimotor gating was observed, despite the presence of an exaggerated startle response. Although KO animals were also able to learn a simple Pavlovian conditioning discrimination, they did display impaired latent inhibition. The presence of pronounced impairments in several domains in NRXN1α KO rats clearly suggests that nonsocial cognitive deficits ca…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bne0000024

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esclassan, F., Francois, J., Phillips, K. G., Loomis, S., & Gilmour, G.
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2015
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
74-85
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2039666355
Cited by
52
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, social dysfunction, hyperactivity, latent inhibition, prepulse inhibition, sensorimotor gating, startle response, operant conditioning, classical conditioning, spatial learning, memory, cognitive impairment, animal models of autism
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Glycoproteins, Male, Neuropeptides, Phenotype, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Gene Deletion, Rats, Sensory Gating, Rats, Transgenic, Gene Knockout Techniques, Prepulse Inhibition, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review