Cited by 93Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

An intra-amygdala circuit specifically regulates social fear learning

Open access
Twining, Robert C, Vantrease, Jaime E, Love, Skyelar, Padival, Mallika, Rosenkranz, J Amiel·2017·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Adaptive social behavior requires transmission and reception of salient social information. Impairment of this reciprocity is a cardinal symptom of autism. The amygdala is a critical mediator of social behavior and is implicated in social symptoms of autism. Here we found that a specific amygdala circuit, from the lateral nucleus to the medial nucleus (LA-MeA), is required for using social cues to learn about environmental cues that signal imminent threats. Disruption of the LA-MeA circuit impaired valuation of these environmental cues and subsequent ability to use a cue to guide behavior. Rats with impaired social guidance of behavior due to knockout of Nrxn1, an analog of autism-associated gene NRXN, exhibited marked LA-MeA deficits. Chemogenetic activation of this circuit reversed these impaired social behaviors. These findings identify an amygdala circuit required to guide emotional responses to socially significant cues and identify an exploratory target for disorders associated with social impairments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.4481

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of KO rats exhibited inappropriate sexual mounting behaviour towards same-sex and same-genotype social interaction partners.

    “The majority of KO rats exhibited inappropriate sexual mounting behaviour towards same-sex and same-genotype social interaction partners (see also Twining et al. 2017)”

    From Neurexin1α knockout in rats causes aberrant social behaviour: relevance for autism and schizophrenia (2025) · cites this paper as Twining et al. 2017

    The Results section ('The LA-MeA circuit in a condition with impaired social behavior'; page not provided) reports mounting directed toward a male conspecific in 5 of 16 Nrxn knockout rats, and says mounting also occurred in knockout pairs housed together. It does not support 'the majority': 5 of 16 is a minority, and no proportion is given for the housed pairs. The Methods classify mounting as an aggressive episode, not sexual behaviour. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies with nrxn1-deficient rats have shown altered patterns of social interest.

    “altered patterns of social interest (Twining et al. 2017)”
  • In rats, an additional intra-amygdala circuit from the lateral nucleus to the medial nucleus is necessary for the social transfer of fear.

    “In rats, an additional intra-amygdala circuit from the lateral nucleus to the medial nucleus is also necessary for the social transfer of fear [109].”

    From Neural circuits regulating prosocial behaviors (2023) · cites this paper as [109]

  • In mice, both congenital knockout and haploinsufficiency of Shank3 lead to diminished social interest in others and are associated with disruption of cortical and subcortical circuits thought to be involved in ASD and its ontogenesis.

    “In mice, both congenital knockout and haploinsufficiency of Shank3 leads to diminished social interest in others and is associated with the disruption of cortical and subcortical circuits thought to be involved in ASD 22–26 and its ontogenesis 22,25,27,28.”
  • All enclosures were well-habituated and did not require conditioning, allowing consistent study of neuronal response across multiple interleaved trials.

    “All enclosures were well-habituated and did not require conditioning (e.g. tone-shock pairing) 28, therefore, allowing us to consistently study neuronal response across multiple interleaved trials.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Twining, R. C., Vantrease, J. E., Love, S., Padival, M., & Rosenkranz, J. A.
Affiliations
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2017-01-23
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
459-469
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2580165755
Cited by
93
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
  • Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH109484, R01MH084970)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
amygdala, lateral amygdala, medial amygdala, autism spectrum disorder, social behavior, NRXN1, chemogenetic activation, threat cues
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Fear, Learning, Male, Neural Pathways, Receptors, Cell Surface, Social Behavior, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, Gene Knockout Techniques, Basolateral Nuclear Complex, Corticomedial Nuclear Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review