The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 204 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Self-citationJob Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
Взаимосвязь статуса занятости и пола с уровнем психологического благополучия
М.Р., Н., & С.И., Б. (2026) · Cifra LLC Journals · doi:10.60797/irj.2026.170.43 · Cited by 7,950
The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 · Cited by 7,143
Self-citationSubjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index
Diener, E. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.34 · Cited by 7,121
Self-citationWilliams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700305 · Cited by 6,250
Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 · Cited by 5,947
New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y · Cited by 4,980
Self-citation
Cited by
Advances in subjective well-being research
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6 · Cited by 2,003
Self-citationEmerson, E., Fortune, N., Llewellyn, G., & Stancliffe, R. (2021) · Disability and Health Journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965 · Cited by 373
Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA
Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Kauffman, S. B. (2018) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2017.1388434 · Cited by 367
Four Decades of the Economics of Happiness: Where Next?
Clark, A. E. (2018) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/roiw.12369 · Cited by 309
Single‐case experimental designs: Characteristics, changes, and challenges
Kazdin, A. E. (2021) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.638 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., & Oishi, S.
- Venue
- Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-104
- ISSN
- 0708-5591 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-7304
- OpenAlex
- W2528352729
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 204
- FWCI
- 66.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/cap0000063
- The paper
- Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
