The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study
Open accessAbstract
Background Loneliness is significantly related to health and wellbeing. However, there is little information on the prevalence of loneliness among people with disability or the association between disability, loneliness and wellbeing. Objective/hypothesis For a nationally representative sample of adults (age 16–64) with/without disability, to examine exposure to three indicators of low social connectedness (loneliness, low perceived social support, social isolation), and to evaluate the association between low social connectedness and wellbeing. To test whether disability status moderated the relationship between low social connectedness and wellbeing. Methods Secondary analysis of data from three annual rounds of the cross-sectional English Community Life Survey (CLS) 2016–19. Results People with disability experienced loneliness, low perceived social support and social isolation at significantly higher rates than people without disability. Effect sizes were significantly greater for loneliness. Disability was associated with lower wellbeing. With one exception, low social connectedness was associated with lower wellbeing. Again, effect sizes were significantly greater for loneliness. The prevalence of loneliness was highest among adults with disability who were younger, economically inactive, living in rented or other accommodation, living alone and with low levels of access to environmental assets. There was no evidence that disability status moderated the association between exposure to low social connectedness and low wellbeing. Conclusions Loneliness was a particularly significant driver of poor wellbeing among people with disability. The relative independence between different indicators of social connectedness suggests that interventions to reduce loneliness will need to do more than simply increase rates of social contact or social support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568352 · Cited by 6,043
Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms
Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8 · Cited by 4,782
Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001 · Cited by 3,465
Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61489-0 · Cited by 2,455
Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well‐Being Contributes to Health and Longevity
Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011) · Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x · Cited by 2,260
Leigh-Hunt, N., Bagguley, D., Bash, K., Turner, V., Turnbull, S., Valtorta, N., & Caan, W. (2017) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.035 · Cited by 2,158
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on
Marmot, M. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m693 · Cited by 1,834
Wang, J., Mann, F., Lloyd-Evans, B., Ma, R., & Johnson, S. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5 · Cited by 1,494
Jones, L., Bellis, M. A., Wood, S., Hughes, K., McCoy, E., Eckley, L., Bates, G., Mikton, C., Shakespeare, T., & Officer, A. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60692-8 · Cited by 1,239
Health at a glance: OECD indicators
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-4774 · Cited by 1,236
Cited by
Vision impairment and psychosocial function in US adults
Almidani, L., Miller, R., Varadaraj, V., Mihailovic, A., Swenor, B. K., & Ramulu, P. Y. (2024) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.6943 · Cited by 36
Dykens, E. M., Roof, E., Hunt-Hawkins, H., & McDonald, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.863999 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Emerson, E., Fortune, N., Llewellyn, G., & Stancliffe, R.
- Venue
- Disability and Health Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100965
- ISSN
- 1876-7583 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6574
- OpenAlex
- W3047283225
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 18.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965
- The paper
- Emerson, E., Fortune, N., Llewellyn, G., & Stancliffe, R. (2021). Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study. Disability and Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.